AI Structured Summary
Not yet generated for this judgment
No AI summary yet
Generate an eight-section analysis of this judgment — facts, issues, reasoning, ratio and a plain-language gist.
Judgment
44 paragraphs · 507 wordsThis petition for pre arrest bail has been filed by the petitioners
Ravi Kumar Malhotra and Anita Devi @ Sonia, both of them being accused
in F.I.R. No. 38 dated 3.3.2017 for offence under Section 420 of the Indian
Penal Code registered with Police Station City Gurdaspur.
Briefly stated facts of the case as per prosecution version are
that F.I.R. in question was registered on the basis of application submitted
by Raman Kumar son of Sh. Subhash Chander and Sanu Sharma s/o Sh.
Davinder Kumar Chasi to Senior Superintendent of Police, Gurdaspur
mentioning therein that Ravi Malhotra and his wife Sonia Malhotra had
induced them to pay `6 lacs each for the purpose of arranging their
migration to Hong Kong. In the month of June, 2016 they had sent them to
Thailand instead of Hong Kong. The accused failed to stick to their promise
to send them to Hong Kong. They did not return their money either on
receipt of this application, the matter had been enquired into by Incharge IO
Wing, Gurdaspur and thereafter formal F.I.R. had been registered.
Apprehending their arrest in the case, accused had approached the Court of
Sessions for grant of pre arrest bail, however, their such petition was
dismissed by Additional Sessions Judge, Gurdaspur vide order dated
14.3.2017. As such they have approached this Court seeking similar relief
by way of making the petition in hand, notice of which was given to the
respondent State.
I have heard learned counsel for the petitioners and learned
State counsel besides going through the record and I find that the petition is
doomed for failure. The allegations against the petitioners are quite serious
and grave. They had induced the complainants to part with substantial
amount of `6 lacs each and their Passport giving them allurement of sending
them to Hong Kong but they did not keep their promise. There is no denying
of fact that people of the region have got a craze to migrate abroad in search
of greener postures and to achieve that aim they are willing to pay any
amount to unscrupulous elements posing as travel agents who are having a
mushroom growth now a days. Such type of people sell dreams to innocent
persons who do not hesitate to put their lives in grave danger. Many
instances have taken place in which persons desirous of migrating abroad
have lost their lives drowning in sea, falling victim to cold weather, shot at
by security forces of foreign countries etc. Therefore, such type of element
is to be dealt with an stern hand.
I find that custodial interrogation of petitioners is necessary to
effect the recovery of the money paid by complainants to them as well as
their Passports and for complete and effective investigation and in case
custodial interrogation is denied to the investigating agency that shall leave
many loop holes and loose ends in the investigation adversely effecting it
which is as uncalled for.
Thus finding no merit in the petition, the same stands
dismissed.
