AI Structured Summary
Not yet generated for this judgment
No AI summary yet
Generate an eight-section analysis of this judgment — facts, issues, reasoning, ratio and a plain-language gist.
Judgment
38 paragraphs · 568 wordsHeard Ms. Arti Bahl, learned counsel appearing for the petitioners as also Mr. Ehsan Mirza, learned Deputy Advocate General appearing for
the respondents who states that by nature of the relief sought for in the writ petition and the order passed by the Deputy Commissioner Jammu, the
writ petition can be disposed of at this stage as there is no private party.
In any event, what is sought to be implemented has all the ingredients of principles of natural justice. Order forming Annexure -B passed by the
Deputy Commissioner Jammu reads as follows:
Sub: Prayer of inhabitants of village Arnia, Shera Chak, Talhar andMoola Chak regarding stopping the encroachment of the link
road/lane leading towards all villages in Arnia Tehsil Arnia District Jammu. Sekeing immediate action against land grabbers
accordingly.
O R D E R
Whereas, the inhabitants of village Arnia, Shera Chak, Talhar and Moola Chak of Tehsil Suchetgarh has represented an application
for protecting their right of using old road/pathway from encroachers which they have been using since long.
Whereas, a report was called in this regard from Tehsildar Arnia and Suchetgarh.
Whereas, both the Tehsildars in their report have stated that the old pathway as per revenue record has been demarcated in presence
of the inhabitants and restored to them.
Whereas, the inhabitants of village Arnia and Chak Shera have again represented and alleged that the bandobasti pathway as
recorded in the revenue records old and new has not been restored.
Whereas, encroachment of pathways is strictly prohibited under the provision of Common Land Regulation Act and any
encroachment whatsoever is liable for eviction under the said Act after following due procedure of law.
As such, it is hereby ordered that Assistant Commissioner (Rev.) Jammu shall fix a date with convenience of both officials and private
applicants and conduct a demarcation which shall become the basis for final decision.
(Simrandeep Singh) IAS
Deputy Commissioner
Jammu.
NO: DCJ/SQ/Pathway-Chak-Shera/2016-17/812-14
Dated 30.06.2016
The grievance of the petitioner is that despite such an order being passed, the authorities concerned have not taken action to remove the
encroachments and restore the pathway.
Mr. Ehsan Mirza, counsel appearing for the respondents states that order dated 30.06.2016 is more clear and precise. There is a specific
direction to the Assistant Commissioner (Rev.) Jammu to fix a date, taking the convenience of both the officials and private applicants and
thereafter conduct the process of demarcation of the pathway. There is also a further direction to remove all forms of encroachments. This Court
finds that the order is clear and appropriate. All that is required is implementation.
In this view of the matter, the Deputy Commissioner Jammu is directed to ensure that his order is implemented in letter and spirit. He shall
ensure that the Assistant Commissioner (Rev.) Jammu conducts the meeting as directed in the proceedings dated 30.06.2016 promptly.
Since the Deputy Commissioner has taken prompt action on the complaint filed by the inhabitants of Village Arnai, Shera Chak, Talhar and
Moola Chak of Tehsil Suchetgarh for removal of encroachment in the link road /lane leading to all these villages, no further order is required except
to direct him to ensure that his order is complied without default, within a time frame. The authorities to strictly follow principles of natural justice to
avoid allegation of arbitrariness.
The Writ petition stands disposed of on the above terms.
