High CourtsSingle Bench

Ravi vs Rekha

Delhi High Court · Decided on 22 April 2025 · Citation: (2025) 04 DEL CK 1052

HON’BLE JUDGES
Manoj Jain, J
ACTS & SECTIONS REFERRED
Code of Criminal Procedure Code, 1973 — Section 125 · Hindu Marriage Act, 1956 — Section 24
RESULT
Disposed Of
CASE NUMBER
Civil Miscellaneous Petition No. 4076 Of 2024 & Civil Miscellaneous Application No. 73050-73051 Of 2024
Ask AI about this case

AI Structured Summary

Not yet generated for this judgment

No AI summary yet

Generate an eight-section analysis of this judgment — facts, issues, reasoning, ratio and a plain-language gist.

Judgment

14 paragraphs · 398 words

Manoj Jain, J

1.

None appears on behalf of the petitioner.

2.

Respondent is, however, present with her counsel Mr. Vikash Trivedi.

3.

Petitioner herein is defending a petition filed by his wife whereby she is seeking divorce on the ground of cruelty and desertion.

4.

During pendency of the abovesaid petition, on the basis of one application moved under Section 24 of Hindu Marriage Act, 1956, the learned Trial Court, vide order dated 17.03.2023 directed the petitioner-husband to pay a sum of Rs.10,000/- per month as ad-interim maintenance with effect from March, 2023 till disposal of the abovesaid application.

5.

Such order is under challenge.

6.

During course of arguments, however, learned counsel for the respondent submits that the present petition is not maintainable as before filing the present petition, the respondent-wife had already withdrawn her divorce petition on 07.12.2023. So much so, even the Execution Petition filed by her has been disposed of, as satisfied. It is submitted that in relation to the abovesaid divorce petition, no proceedings of any nature, whatsoever, are pending.

7.

A careful perusal of the petition would also indicate that even the petitioner-husband, in the present petition, has mentioned that the divorce petition has been withdrawn by his wife on 07.12.2023.

8.

The abovesaid order was, even otherwise, interim in nature and the learned Judge, Family Court, while hearing arguments on the application moved under Section 24 of Hindu Marriage Act, 1956, would have, certainly, taken response from the petitioner-husband, before taking any final decision with respect to the grant of maintenance.

9.

The grievance in the present petition is also, perhaps, to the effect that the petitioner-husband was not heard before the abovesaid interim order was passed.

10.

Be that as it may, keeping in mind the fact that the divorce petition has already been withdrawn by the respondent wife on 07.12.2023, this Court does not find any substance in the present petition, as for all practical purposes, it has already become infructuous.

11.

The petition stands disposed of accordingly.

12.

All the pending applications also stand disposed of accordingly.

13.

Before parting, this Court, would, however, like to clarify that when asked, learned counsel for the respondent also apprised that the respondent-wife has already filed a petition under Section 125 Cr.P.C. seeking maintenance and such petition is now listed for further consideration before the concerned Family Court on 24.05.2025.