High CourtsSingle Bench

Ravilas Hotamsing Rajput vs State Of Gujarat

Gujarat High Court · Decided on 21 July 2020 · Citation: (2020) 07 GUJ CK 0073

HON’BLE JUDGES
Vipul M. Pancholi, J
ACTS & SECTIONS REFERRED
Code Of Criminal Procedure, 1973 — Section 439 · Indian Penal Code, 1860 — Section 380, 413, 454, 457
RESULT
Allowed
CASE NUMBER
R/Criminal Misc.Application No. 9786 Of 2020
Ask AI about this case

AI Structured Summary

Not yet generated for this judgment

No AI summary yet

Generate an eight-section analysis of this judgment — facts, issues, reasoning, ratio and a plain-language gist.

Judgment

39 paragraphs · 653 words

Vipul M. Pancholi, J

1.

Rule. Learned APP Mr. Chintan Dave waives service of Rule on behalf of the respondent State.

2.

The present application is filed under Section 439 of the Code of Criminal Procedure, 1973, for regular bail in connection with FIR being C.R.No.I-

60 of 2019 registered with Navsari Town Police Station, Navsari for offence under Sections 380, 454, 457 and 413 of the Indian Penal Code.

3.

Learned Advocate appearing on behalf of the applicant submits that considering the nature of the offence, the applicant may be enlarged on regular

bail by imposing suitable conditions.

4.

Learned APP appearing on behalf of the respondent- State has opposed grant of regular bail looking to the nature and gravity of the offence.

5.

Learned Advocates appearing on behalf of the respective parties do not press for further reasoned order.

6.

Having heard the learned advocates for the parties and perusing the material placed on record and taking into consideration the facts of the case,

nature of allegations, gravity of offences, role attributed to the accused, without discussing the evidence in detail, this Court is of the opinion that this is

a fit case to exercise the discretion and enlarge the applicant on regular bail.

7.

This Court has considered following aspects,

(a) applicant is in jail since 23.02.2020;

(b) investigation is over and charge-sheet is filed;

(c) case is triable by the Court of Magistrate;

(d) co-accused has been enlarged by the concerned Sessions Court.

(e) it is submitted that applicant is arrested by way of transfer warrant;

(f) I have considered the allegations levelled against the applicant;

Looking to the overall facts and circumstances of the present case, I am inclined to consider the case of the applicant.

8.

This Court has also taken into consideration the law laid down by the Hon'ble Apex Court in the case of Sanjay Chandra Vs. Central Bureau of

Investigation, reported in [2012] 1 SCC 40.

9.

Hence, the present application is allowed. The applicant is ordered to be released on regular bail in connection with FIR being C.R.No.I-60 of 2019

registered with Navsari Town Police Station, Navsari on executing a personal bond of Rs.10,000/- (Rupees Ten Thousand only) with one surety of the

like amount to the satisfaction of the trial Court and subject to the conditions that he shall;

[a] not take undue advantage of liberty or misuse liberty;

[b] not act in a manner injurious to the interest of the prosecution;

[c] surrender passport, if any, to the lower court within a week;

[d] not leave the India without prior permission of the concerned trial court;

[e] mark presence before the concerned Police Station between 1st to 10th day of every English calendar month for a period of six months between

11:00 a.m. and 2:00 p.m.;

[f] furnish the present address of residence to the Investigating Officer and also to the Court at the time of execution of the bond and shall not change

the residence without prior permission of the concerned trial court;

10.

The authorities will shall adhere to its own circular regarding Covid-19 and thereafter release the applicant only if he is not required in connection

with any other offence for the time being. If breach of any of the above conditions is committed, the Sessions Judge concerned will be free to issue

warrant or take appropriate action in the matter. Bail bond to be executed before the lower Court having jurisdiction to try the case. It will be open for

the concerned Court to delete, modify and/or relax any of the above conditions, in accordance with law.

11.

At the trial, the Trial Court shall not be influenced by the prima facie observations made by this Court in the present order.

12.

Rule is made absolute to the aforesaid extent. Direct service is permitted. Registry to communicate this order to the concerned Court/Authority

through Fax or Email.