High CourtsSingle Bench

Rehmat Bano vs Mangi Lal And Others

Rajasthan High Court · Decided on 22 January 2024 · Citation: (2024) 01 RAJ CK 0109

HON’BLE JUDGES
Rekha Borana, J
RESULT
Dismissed
CASE NUMBER
Civil Miscellaneous Appeal No. 755 Of 2019
Ask AI about this case

AI Structured Summary

Not yet generated for this judgment

No AI summary yet

Generate an eight-section analysis of this judgment — facts, issues, reasoning, ratio and a plain-language gist.

Judgment

7 paragraphs · 140 words

Rekha Borana, J

1.

Learned counsel for the appellant submits that a compromise has been entered into between the owner of the vehicle and the claimants and in terms of the compromise, the claim amount has been paid by the owner to the claimants. Therefore, he sought permission to withdraw the present appeal.

2.

Learned counsel for the claimants has not disputed the fact of the compromise having been entered into between the parties and further, the amount having been received by the claimants.

3.

The compromise deed as entered into between the parties has been furnished to the Court which is taken on record.

4.

In view of the submission made, the permission as prayed for is granted.

5.

Accordingly, the present appeal is dismissed as withdrawn.

6.

Stay  petition  and  all  pending  applications,  if  any,  stand disposed of.