High CourtsSingle Bench

Reliance General Insurance Co. Ltd vs Master Rajesh & Ors

Delhi High Court · Decided on 28 November 2017 · Citation: (2017) 11 DEL CK 0156

HON’BLE JUDGES
R.K.Gauba, J
RESULT
Disposed Of
CASE NUMBER
MAC. Appeal No. 935 Of 2012, Civil Miscellaneous Application No. 15065 Of 2012
Ask AI about this case

AI Structured Summary

Not yet generated for this judgment

No AI summary yet

Generate an eight-section analysis of this judgment — facts, issues, reasoning, ratio and a plain-language gist.

Judgment

19 paragraphs · 340 words

R.K.Gauba, J

1.

While awarding compensation by judgment dated 17.07.2012, in accident claim case (MACT No.1125/10/09), in favour of the first respondent

(claimant), for the injuries suffered by him in a motor vehicular accident that occurred on 02.02.2009, rendering him permanently disabled, his

functional disability having been assessed to the extent of fifty five per cent (55%), the tribunal awarded Rs. 17,28,800/- as compensation and added

the element of interest @ 12% per annum, as the liability on the appellant (insurer), it admittedly having insured the offending vehicle against third

party risk for the period in question, this besides Rs.25,000/- towards lawyer’s fee and Rs.5100/- towards out of pocket expenses.

2.

The appeal at hand is pressed only on the question of rate of interest and against levy of lawyer’s fee and out of pocket expenses.

3.

Following the consistent view taken by this Court, the rate of interest is reduced to 9% (nine per cent) per annum from the date of filing of the

petition till realization. [see judgment dated 22.02.2016 in MAC.APP. 165/2011 Oriental Insurance Co Ltd v. Sangeeta Devi & Ors.].

4.

There being no justification for such inclusion, the directions in the impugned award for payment of lawyer’s fee and out of pocket expenses

are set aside.

5.

The award is modified accordingly.

6.

By order dated 27.08.2012, the insurance company had been directed to deposit sixty per cent (60%) of the awarded amount (excluding counsel fee

and out of pocket expenses) with proportionate interest with UCO Bank, Delhi High Court Branch. It seems there have been no directions for release

of such amount. The amount shall be paid by the registry to the claimant in terms of the impugned award after recalculation of the liability of the

insurer keeping in view the modification in the rate of interest. For the balance, claimant is at liberty to approach the tribunal with appropriation

applications.

7.

The statutory deposit shall be refunded to the appellant.

8.

The appeal along with pending application stands disposed of in above terms.