High CourtsSingle Bench

Remfry vs DePenning and Another

Calcutta High Court · Decided on 23 July 1884 · Citation: (1884) ILR (Cal) 929

HON’BLE JUDGES
Pigot, J
ACTS & SECTIONS REFERRED
Administrator Generals Act, 1963 — Section 35
Ask AI about this case

AI Structured Summary

Not yet generated for this judgment

No AI summary yet

Generate an eight-section analysis of this judgment — facts, issues, reasoning, ratio and a plain-language gist.

Judgment

1 paragraphs · 74 words

Pigot, J.—In this case execution must issue; Section 35 of the Administrator-General''s Act is limited to the express purpose for which it was enacted, and there is nothing in that Act or in the CPC to change the position of the Administrator--General, or to put him in a better position than any ordinary suitor. I must follow the course pursued in the suit of the Alliance Bank v. Hoff; Unrep and execution must issue.