High CourtsSingle Bench

Renjith vs State Of Kerala

High Court Of Kerala · Decided on 12 April 2022 · Citation: (2022) 04 KL CK 0085

HON’BLE JUDGES
K. Babu, J
ACTS & SECTIONS REFERRED
Code of Criminal Procedure, 1973 — Section 489 · Indian Penal Code, 1860 — Section 143, 147, 149, 294(b), 308, 323, 324, 326, 341
RESULT
Allowed
CASE NUMBER
Bail Application No. 2672 Of 2022
Ask AI about this case

AI Structured Summary

Not yet generated for this judgment

No AI summary yet

Generate an eight-section analysis of this judgment — facts, issues, reasoning, ratio and a plain-language gist.

Judgment

13 paragraphs · 379 words

K. Babu, J

1.

This is an application filed under Section 439 of the Code of Criminal Procedure.

2.

The petitioners are accused Nos.2, 3 and 4 in Crime No.145/2022 of Marayamuttom Police Station, Thiruvananthapuram District. The offences alleged against the petitioners are punishable under Sections 143, 147, 148, 294(b), 341, 323, 324, 326 and 308 r/w Section 149 of the Indian Penal Code.

3.

The prosecution case is that on 28.02.2022 at about 07.30 p.m, the petitioners and the other accused formed themselves into an unlawful assembly and voluntarily caused grievous hurt to the defacto complainant. The petitioners and the other accused committed the above acts in furtherance of their common intention and with the knowledge that if they by that act caused death of the defacto complainant they would be guilty of culpable homicide not amounting to murder.

4.

The petitioners were arrested on 01-03-2022 and have been in judicial custody since then.

5.

Heard the learned counsel for the petitioners and the learned Public Prosecutor.

6.

The learned counsel for the petitioners submitted that the investigation is over, and therefore, further detention of the petitioners is not required. The learned counsel for the petitioners further submitted that as far as the present petitioners are concerned, no specific overt acts have been alleged.

7.

The learned Public Prosecutor opposed the bail plea of the petitioners and also submitted that accused Nos.1 and 5 have criminal antecedents.

8.

Having regard to the stage of investigation, the period of judicial custody undergone by the petitioners and the nature of the allegations raised against the petitioners, I am of the view that the petitioners are entitled to be released on bail on conditions.

In the result, the Bail Application is allowed as follows:

(a) The petitioners shall be released on bail on their executing bond for Rs.50,000/- (Rupees Fifty Thousand Only) each with two solvent sureties each for the like sum to the satisfaction of the Magistrate concerned.

(b) They shall appear before the Investigating Officer on all Mondays and Fridays between 10 a.m and 11 a.m for a period of three months or till the final report is filed, whichever is earlier.

(c) They shall not try to influence the prosecution witnesses or attempt to tamper with the evidence.