Supreme CourtDivision Bench

Renu Gautam vs Vinod Gautam

Supreme Court Of India · Decided on 3 January 2000 · Citation: AIR 2000 SC 3405 : (2000) AIRSCW 1795 : (2000) 1 DMC 396 : (2000) 2 JT 83 : (2001) 3 Supreme 551 : (2001) 2 UC 18

HON’BLE JUDGES
A. S. Anand, C.J · R. C. Lahoti, J
RESULT
Allowed
CASE NUMBER
Transfer Petition (C) No. 820 of 1999
Ask AI about this case

AI Structured Summary

Not yet generated for this judgment

No AI summary yet

Generate an eight-section analysis of this judgment — facts, issues, reasoning, ratio and a plain-language gist.

Judgment

8 paragraphs · 192 words
1.

The respondent is present in person. Counter has also been filed.

2.

Heard.

3.

Without going into the allegations made in the Transfer Petition and the rebuttal thereof made in the counter affidavit, in the peculiar facts and circumstances of this case, it appears appropriate to us to allow this petition.

4.

We, accordingly, withdraw Divorce Petition filed by the respondent being H.M.A. No. 22 of 1995 titled Vinod Kumar Gautam v. Renu Gautam, which is pending in the Court of the learned Additional District Judge, Faridabad from that Court and transfer it to the file of the learned District Judge, Delhi who may either try the petition him self or assign it to a Court of competent jurisdiction under him.

5.

The learned Additional District Judge, Faridabad shall send the record of the case to the transferee Court without any delay.

6.

The petitioner through her learned Counsel and the respondent, who is present in person, are directed to appear before the learned District Judge, Delhi on 22nd January, 2000.

7.

The transferee Court shall expeditiously dispose of the Matrimonial Petition.

8.

The Transfer Petition is, accordingly, allowed. No costs.