High CourtsSingle Bench

Renubala Sabat vs State Of Odisha And Others

Orissa High Court · Decided on 26 September 2022 · Citation: (2022) 09 OHC CK 0192

HON’BLE JUDGES
Arindam Sinha, J
RESULT
Disposed Of
CASE NUMBER
ARBA No.32 Of 2022

AI Structured Summary

Not yet generated for this judgment

Judgment

8 paragraphs · 155 words

Arindam Sinha, J

I.A. No.49 of 2022.

1.

Mr. Maharana, learned advocate appears on behalf of respondent no.3 in the appeal. He prays for adjournment on absence of his leader. Mr. Behera, learned advocate appears on behalf of applicant/appellant and submits, in the circumstances, delay in preferring the appeal be condoned. His client has applied for condonation of delay. He submits further, copy of the objection used by respondent no.3 has been handed over just now. There does not appear to be objection to condonation of delay.

2.

Mr. Das, learned advocate, Addl. Standing Counsel appears on behalf of respondent nos.5 and 6.

3.

Prayer in the application is for condonation of delay of 55 days. Stamp Reporter has reported delay of 21 days. Perused causes shown in the application. The causes are accepted and the delay, condoned.

4.

The application is allowed and disposed of.

5.

List the appeal on 14th October, 2022.

………………………..