High CourtsSingle Bench

Rinku vs State Of Madhya Pradesh

Madhya Pradesh High Court · Decided on 6 May 2021 · Citation: (2021) 05 MP CK 0033

HON’BLE JUDGES
Vijay Kumar Shukla, J
ACTS & SECTIONS REFERRED
Code Of Criminal Procedure, 1973 — Section 473(3), 439 · Madhya Pradesh Excise Act, 1915 — Section 34(2)
RESULT
Allowed
CASE NUMBER
Miscellaneous Criminal Case No.22674 Of 2021
Ask AI about this case

AI Structured Summary

Not yet generated for this judgment

No AI summary yet

Generate an eight-section analysis of this judgment — facts, issues, reasoning, ratio and a plain-language gist.

Judgment

24 paragraphs · 446 words

Vijay Kumar Shukla, J

On account of prevailing conditions worldwide brought about by the COVID-19 virus, the present application has been heard through video

conferencing in order to maintain social distancing. The necessary parties have effectively been represented by their respective counsel via video

conferencing.

Heard and perused the record.

This is a first bail application filed by the applicant under Section 439 of the Code of Criminal Procedure for grant of bail in connection with Crime

No.155/2021, registered at the Police Station Dehat,District Chhindwara(M.P.) for the offence punishable under Section 34(2) of Excise Act.

It is alleged that 60 bulk liters of liquor has been seized from the possession of the applicant. The learned counsel for the applicant submits that the

applicant is in jail since 09-04-2021. Learned counsel for the applicant further submits that there is no criminal record of the applicant.

Considering the aforesaid submissions and taking into consideration the alleged quantity of liquor and the fact that there is no criminal record of the

applicant, I am of the view that the present applicant is entitled to be released on bail.

Accordingly, the present applicant-Rinku shall be released from the custody on furnishing a personal bond of Rs.50,000/- (Rs. Fifty Thousand Only)

with one surety of the like amount to the satisfaction of the trial Court. Further, the applicant shall comply the provisions of Section 437(3) Cr.P.C.

The prison authorities are also requested to ensure compliance with the order passed by the Supreme Court IN RE : CONTAGION OF COVID 19

VIRUS I N PRISONS in SUO MOTU W.P. (C) No.1/2020 and ensure that the applicant is examined by the jail doctor before his release. If the

applicant shows symptoms of COVID-19, the doctor shall forthwith direct him to be produced before the appropriate hospital designated for the

detection and treatment of COVID-19 patients. If the doctor is of the opinion that the applicant is not affected with the virus, the jail authorities shall

ensure his transportation from the jail till his place of residence.

It is further made clear that if it is found that the applicant is involved in any other case during the trial, this bail order shall stand cancelled

automatically without reference to the Court and the Police will be at liberty to arrest the applicant.

A typed copy of this order be forwarded to the Office of the Advocate General and to Shri Harish Shukla, learned Panel Lawyer, on their respective

e-mail address for intimation to the Police Station concerned. The Office is also directed to forward a copy of this order to the learned Court below.

Accordingly, the bail application is allowed.

C.c. as per rules.