High CourtsSingle Bench

Riyasat Ali vs State Of Rajasthan

Rajasthan High Court · Decided on 9 April 2024 · Citation: (2024) 04 RAJ CK 0056

HON’BLE JUDGES
Farjand Ali, J
ACTS & SECTIONS REFERRED
Code Of Criminal Procedure, 1973 — Section 439 · Indian Penal Code, 1860 — Section 308, 325
RESULT
Allowed
CASE NUMBER
Criminal Miscellaneous Bail Application No. 3770 Of 2023
Ask AI about this case

AI Structured Summary

Not yet generated for this judgment

No AI summary yet

Generate an eight-section analysis of this judgment — facts, issues, reasoning, ratio and a plain-language gist.

Judgment

28 paragraphs · 358 words

@JUDGEMENTTAG- JUDGEMENT

Farjand Ali, J

1.

The jurisdiction of this Court has been invoked by way of filing an application under Section 439 Cr.P.C. at the instance of accused-petitioner. The requisite details of the matter are tabulated herein below:

S.No.

Particulars of the Case

1

FIR Number

416/2023

2

Concerned Police Station

Anoopgarh.

3

District

Sri Ganganagar

4

Offences alleged in the FIR

U/Sec. 341, 323, 143 of IPC

5

Offences added, if any

U/Sec. 452, 308 of IPC

6

Date of passing of impugned order

12.03.2024

2.

It is contended on behalf of the accused-petitioner that no case for the alleged offences is made out against him and his incarceration is not warranted. There are no factors at play in the case at hand that may work against grant of bail to the accused- petitioner and he has been made an accused based on conjectures and surmises.

3.

Contrary to the submissions of learned counsel for the petitioner, learned Public Prosecutor opposes the bail application and submits that the present case is not fit for enlargement of accused on bail.

4.

I have considered the submissions made by both the parties and have perused the material available on record.

5.

Upon consideration of the submissions that the case of the prosecution would not travel beyond Section 325 of I.P.C. and even no offence under Section 308 of IPC is made out, this Court deems it appropriate to accede the prayer made by the petitioner. There is high probability that the trial may take long time to conclude. In light of these facts and circumstances, it is deemed suitable to grant the benefit of bail to the petitioner in the present matter.

6.

Accordingly, the instant bail application under Section 439 Cr.P.C. is allowed and it is ordered that the accused-petitioner as named in the cause title shall be enlarged on bail provided he furnishes a personal bond in the sum of Rs.50,000/- with two sureties of Rs.25,000/- each to the satisfaction of the learned trial Judge for his appearance before the court concerned on all the dates of hearing as and when called upon to do so.