High CourtsSingle Bench

Rizwan vs State of Uttaranchal

Uttarakhand High Court · Decided on 14 February 2001 · Citation: (2001) CriLJ 3813 : (2001) 1 UC 379

HON’BLE JUDGES
Mahesh Chand Jain, J
ACTS & SECTIONS REFERRED
Penal Code, 1860 (IPC) — Section 302
CASE NUMBER
Criminal Miscellaneous Bail Application No. 60 of 2001

AI Structured Summary

Not yet generated for this judgment

No AI summary yet

Generate an eight-section analysis of this judgment — facts, issues, reasoning, ratio and a plain-language gist.

Judgment

3 paragraphs · 127 words

M.C. Jain, J.—Heard learned Counsel for the applicant and learned A.G.A.

2.

It is pointed out. for the applicant that only the role of catching hold the accused (deceased) is assigned to the present applicant post-mortem report shows that the deceased died on account of single cut wound. The main accused Irfan, who is the son of the applicant is already said to be in jail. So far as the present applicant is concerned, a case for the grant of bail is made out.

3.

Let the applicant Rizwan shall be released on ball in Case Crime No. 53/2000 u/s 302, I.P.C. P.S. Shaymapur, District Harldwar on his furnishing a personal bond and two sureties each in the like amount to the satisfaction of the C.J.M., Haridwar.