AI Structured Summary
Not yet generated for this judgment
No AI summary yet
Generate an eight-section analysis of this judgment — facts, issues, reasoning, ratio and a plain-language gist.
Judgment
29 paragraphs · 561 wordsGopinath P, J
The petitioner is the accused in Crime No.3049/2021 of Neyyattinkara Police Station, Thiruvananthapuram District alleging commission of offences
under Sections 341, 354(A) of the Indian Penal Code and Section 8 read with Section 7, 10 read with 9 (f), 12 read with 11 (i) of the Protection of
Children from Sexual Offences Act.
The allegation against the petitioner who is stated to be running a tuition centre is that he fondled the breast of the de facto complainant who was
attending tuition centre for the purpose of tuition and thereby he committed the offences alleged against him.
The learned counsel for the petitioner submits that the petitioner is absolutely innocent in the matter. It is submitted that the petitioner is a 53 year
old man who has been running a tuition centre for large number of years and no similar allegations have been raised in the past. It is submitted that the
allegations are raised on the basis of some misunderstanding. It is pointed out that even going by the statement of the victim, the allegation is that the
petitioner molested her on one occasion in the month of April 2021. It is submitted that the petitioner has been in custody from 18-12-2021 and has
thus completed 42 days in custody. It is submitted that the continued detention of the petitioner is not required for the purposes of any investigation.
I have heard the learned Public Prosecutor also. The learned Public Prosecutor has taken me through the statement of the victim and has pointed
out the nature of the allegations against the petitioner. It is submitted that the petitioner was holding a position of trust and the allegations against the
petitioner are, therefore, more serious. It is submitted that the release of the petitioner on bail may not be conducive to the prosecution, as there is
every chance that the victim may be intimidated and influenced.
Having regard to the facts and circumstances of the case and considering the nature of the allegations against the petitioner and taking into account
the fact that he has been in custody from 18-12-2021 and also considering the fact that his continued detention may not be necessary for the purpose
of any investigation, I am of the view that the petitioner can be granted bail with sufficient conditions to ensure that the petitioner does not influence or
intimidate the minor victim.
In the result this bail application is allowed. It is directed that the petitioner shall be released on bail, subject to the following conditions:-
(i) The petitioner shall execute a bond for a sum of Rs.50,000/- (Rupees fifty thousand only) with two solvent sureties each for the like sum to the satisfaction of the
jurisdictional Court;
(ii) The Petitioner shall report before the Investigating officer in Crime No.3049/2021 of Neyyattinkara Police Station on every Saturday at 11 a.m until filing of final
report in the aforesaid crime;
(iii) The petitioner shall not attempt to interfere with the investigation, influence or intimidate the victim or any witness in Crime No.3049/2021 of Neyyattinkara Police
Station;
(iv) The petitioner shall not involve in any other crime while on bail.
If any of the aforesaid conditions are violated, the Investigating officer in Crime No.3049/2021 of Neyyattinkara Police Station may file an application
before the jurisdictional Court for cancellation of bail.
