AI Structured Summary
Not yet generated for this judgment
No AI summary yet
Generate an eight-section analysis of this judgment — facts, issues, reasoning, ratio and a plain-language gist.
Judgment
22 paragraphs · 490 wordsAnil Kumar Choudhary, J
Apprehending his arrest in connection with Birsanagar P.S. Case No.106 of 2020 registered under sections 147, 148, 149, 341, 323, 324, 307, 504, 427
of the Indian Penal Code, the petitioner has moved this Court for grant of privileges of anticipatory bail.
Learned counsel for the petitioner submits that the allegation against the petitioner is that the petitioner was the member of an unlawful assembly and
in prosecution of common object of the assembly; he attempted to murder the informant, Ashok Mukhi and Rohit Munda and caused injuries to them.
It is submitted that the allegations against the petitioner are all false. It is next submitted that the petitioner is ready and willing to pay Rs.10,000/- as ad
interim victim compensation to the informant without prejudice to his defence in this case and undertakes to cooperate with the investigation of the
case and also undertakes that he will not annoy or disturb the informant or the victims or their family members in any manner during the pendency of
the case. It is lastly submitted that the co-accused, with similar allegations, have already been given the privileges of anticipatory bail by this Court vide
order dated 29.07.2021 passed in A.B.A. No.4754 of 2021. Hence, it is submitted that the petitioner be given the privilege of anticipatory bail.
Learned Spl.P.P appearing for the State opposes the prayer for anticipatory bail of the petitioner.
Considering the submissions of the counsels and the fact as discussed above, I am of the opinion that it is a fit case where the above named petitioner
be given the privilege of anticipatory bail. Hence, in the event of his arrest or surrender within a period of six weeks from the date of this order, he
shall be released on bail on depositing a demand draft of Rs.10,000/- as ad interim victim compensation drawn in favour of the informant and on
furnishing bail bond of Rs.25,000/- (Rupees Twenty Five Thousand) with two sureties of the like amount each to the satisfaction of learned Judicial
Magistrate, Jamshedpur in connection with Birsanagar P.S. Case No.106 of 2020 with the condition that the petitioner will cooperate with the
investigation of the case and appear before the Investigating Officer as and when noticed by him and will furnish his mobile number and a copy of his
Aadhar Card in the court below with the undertaking that he will not change his mobile number during the pendency of the case with further condition
that he will not annoy or disturb the informant or the victims or their family members in any manner during the pendency of the case and subject to the
conditions laid down under section 438 (2) Cr. P.C.
In case the petitioner deposits the said demand draft, the court below is directed to issue notice to the informant of this case and on his proper
identification, the court below shall handover the same to him forthwith.
