High CourtsSingle Bench

Ron Mathew vs State Of Kerala

High Court Of Kerala · Decided on 7 October 2022 · Citation: (2022) 10 KL CK 0035

HON’BLE JUDGES
Bechu Kurian Thomas, J
ACTS & SECTIONS REFERRED
Code of Criminal Procedure, 1973 — Section 439 · Indian Penal Code, 1860 — Section 34, 120B, 212, 427, 436, 452, 506(i)
RESULT
Allowed
CASE NUMBER
Bail Application No. 7691 Of 2022
Ask AI about this case

AI Structured Summary

Not yet generated for this judgment

No AI summary yet

Generate an eight-section analysis of this judgment — facts, issues, reasoning, ratio and a plain-language gist.

Judgment

14 paragraphs · 405 words

Bechu Kurian Thomas, J.

1.

This is an application seeking regular bail filed under Section 439 of the Code of Criminal Procedure, 1973.

2.

Petitioner is the 4th accused in Crime No.675/2022 of the Melukavu Police Station, alleging offences punishable under Sections 120B, 4525, 436, 427, 506(i), 212 r/w 34 of Indian penal Code, 1860.

3.

According to the prosecution, on 16.07.2022, the accused damaged the window panes of the house of the defacto complainant and set fire to a motor cycle as well as a car, and thereby committed the offences alleged against him.

4.

Shri.P.C.Haridas, the learned counsel for the petitioner contended that the prosecution allegations are false and the incident as alleged had never occurred. It was also submitted that since the petitioner was arrested on 01.08.2022 his continued detention is not essential for the purpose of the prosecution.

5.

Shri.Sudheer.G., the learned Public Prosecutor opposed the grant of bail and contended that the allegations against the petitioner are serious in nature. The learned Public Prosecutor further submitted that final report in the case was filed on 20.09.2022.

6.

A perusal of the case diary reveals that prima facie there are materials on record to connect the petitioner with the crime. However, since petitioner was remanded to judicial custody on 01.08.2022, I am of the view that the continued detention of the petitioner is not required in the circumstances of the case, more so since the investigation is over and the final report has already been filed. Therefore, the petitioner is entitled to be released on bail.

In the result, this application is allowed on the following conditions:-

(a) Petitioner shall be released on bail on him executing a bond for Rs.50,000/- (Rupees Fifty thousand only) with two solvent sureties each for the like sum to the satisfaction of the court having jurisdiction.

(b) Petitioner shall co-operate with the trial of the case.

(c) Petitioner shall not intimidate or attempt to influence the witnesses; nor shall he attempt to tamper with the evidence.

(d) Petitioner shall not commit any similar offences while he is on bail.

(e) Petitioner shall not leave the country without the permission of the jurisdictional Court.

In case of violation of any of the above conditions, the jurisdictional Court shall be empowered to consider the application for cancellation, if any, and pass appropriate orders in accordance with the law, notwithstanding the bail having been granted by this Court.