High CourtsSINGLE BENCH

R.Rangaraj vs S.Sulochana, & Ors.

Madras High Court · Decided on 31 October 2017 · Citation: (2017) 10 MAD CK 0040

HON’BLE JUDGES
M.Duraiswamy
RESULT
Dismissed
CASE NUMBER
859 of 2010 and M P No 1 of 2010

AI Structured Summary

Not yet generated for this judgment

Judgment

9 paragraphs · 176 words
1.

The learned counsel for the appellant submitted that the sole appellant R.Rangaraj had died on 04.10.2012, leaving behind the respondents 4

and 5 and their guardian Jothilakshmi as surviving legal representatives. Further, the learned counsel submitted that the respondents 4 and 5 have

attained majority and that they have also filed petitions in the connected Appeals in A.S.Nos.832 and 833 of 2010 to declare them as major and

to discharge their guardian, which were also allowed by this Court.

Further, the learned counsel submitted that the legal representatives of the deceased appellant R.Rangaraj, had instructed him to withdraw the first

appeal for the reason that the dispute between the parties was settled and that a joint memorandum of compromise dated 08.10.2017 was also

filed in A.S.No.833 of 2010 today i.e., 31.10.2017. In these circumstances, the learned counsel sought the permission of this Court to withdraw

the Appeal and has also made an endorsement to that effect.

2.

In view of the same, the Appeal stands dismissed as withdrawn. No costs. Connected miscellaneous petition is closed.