High CourtsSingle Bench(2018) 01 KL CK 0070

R.SAKTHIKUMAR vs INTELLIGENCE OFFICER & ORS.

High Court Of Kerala · Decided on 11 January 2018

HON’BLE JUDGES
P.B.Suresh Kumar
CASE NUMBER
1074 of 2018

AI Structured Summary

Not yet generated for this judgment

Judgment

9 paragraphs · 192 words
1.

Challenging Ext.P1 order imposing penalty under the Kerala Value Added Tax Act, the petitioner preferred Ext.P2 appeal before the second

respondent. Ext.P3 is the application for stay preferred by the petitioner in the appeal. It is stated that proceedings have already been initiated for

realisation of the amounts covered by the order impugned in the appeal. The grievance of the petitioner, in the circumstances, concerns the delay

on the part of the appellate authority in deciding the appeal.

2.

Heard the learned counsel for the petitioner as also the learned Government Pleader. Having regard to the facts and circumstances of the case

as also the orders passed by this Court in similar and identical matters, the writ petition is disposed of directing the appellate authority to consider

and pass orders on the application for stay preferred by the petitioner in the appeal, within one month from the date of receipt of a copy of the

judgment. Needless to say that till orders are passed on the application for stay, further proceedings for realization of the amounts covered by the

order impugned in the appeal shall be deferred by the respondents concerned.