AI Structured Summary
Not yet generated for this judgment
No AI summary yet
Generate an eight-section analysis of this judgment — facts, issues, reasoning, ratio and a plain-language gist.
Judgment
17 paragraphs · 362 wordsHeard Mr. Manoj Kr. Sah, learned counsel for the petitioners and Mr. Manoj Kr. Mishra, learned A.P.P. for the State.
Defects as pointed out by the office are ignored. The petitioners have prayed for grant of anticipatory bail, as they are apprehending their arrest in
connection with Complaint Case No. 14/2014, corresponding to T.R. No. 109/2020.
The marriage of the daughter of the complainant was solemnized with Rakesh Ramdas on 23.05.2010. It has been alleged that there was a demand of
Rs. 25,000/- and on 13.09.2013 the daughter of the complainant became seriously ill and ultimately died in Hospital.
The petitioner no. 1 appears to be the mother-in-law of the deceased while the petitioner no. 2 is the sister-in-law of the deceased. It appears that
earlier a case was instituted against the husband of the deceased namely Rakesh Ramdas u/s 304B I.P.C. being Pathargama P.S. Case No. 136 of
2013. On conclusion of investigation, final form was submitted showing it to be a mistake of facts and on a protest petition having been filed by the
complainant, cognizance was taken for the offence punishable u/s 304B I.P.C. The cause of death according to the postmortem report has been
opined to be antemortem hemorrhage and shock. It is to be noted herein that at the time of death, the deceased was carrying a pregnancy of eight and
half months and complications arising out of such pregnancy leading to the death of the deceased cannot be ruled out. The husband of the deceased
namely Rakesh Ramdas has already been granted anticipatory bail by this Court in A.B.A. No. 2554 of 2020.
Regard being had to the aforesaid facts, the petitioners are directed to surrender before the learned court below within a period of four weeks and on
their surrender, they shall be released on bail on furnishing bail bond of Rs. 10,000/- (Rupees Ten Thousand only) each with two sureties of the like
amount each to the satisfaction of learned S.D.J.M., Godda in connection with Complaint Case No. 14/2014, corresponding to T.R. No. 109/2020,
subject to the conditions as laid down under Section 438(2) of the Code of Criminal Procedure.
This application stands allowed.
