High CourtsSingle Bench

Rupdhar Padhan vs Pradip Kumar Boda, Branch Manager, SBI

Orissa High Court · Decided on 11 March 2022 · Citation: (2022) 03 OHC CK 0058

HON’BLE JUDGES
Arindam Sinha, J
RESULT
Disposed Of
CASE NUMBER
CONTC No.4694 Of 2021
Ask AI about this case

AI Structured Summary

Not yet generated for this judgment

No AI summary yet

Generate an eight-section analysis of this judgment — facts, issues, reasoning, ratio and a plain-language gist.

Judgment

6 paragraphs · 142 words

Arindam Sinha, J

1.

Mr. Balkrishnan, learned advocate appears on behalf of alleged contemner and submits, there has been compliance as evidenced by writing dated 31st December, 2021 of applicant. He tenders unqualified apology on behalf of his client for delayed compliance.

2.

Mr. Tripathy, learned advocate appears on behalf of applicant and points out from order dated 4th December, 2020, directions in which were to be complied. He submits, his client is a poor farmer and Crop Insurance money was to be given written two months from 4th December, 2020 but was paid just on 31st December, 2021 and the writing obtained by alleged contemner.

3.

There has been delayed compliance. It appears that the delay was at instance of alleged contemner. However, since the money has been paid Court accepts the apology.

4.

The contempt application is disposed of.

……………………