AI Structured Summary
Not yet generated for this judgment
No AI summary yet
Generate an eight-section analysis of this judgment — facts, issues, reasoning, ratio and a plain-language gist.
Judgment
3 paragraphs · 167 wordsMr. R. Phani Krishna, witness for the Petitioner is present today. The witness was part cross-examined by Ms. Srishti Gupta, learned counsel appearing for the Respondent. Further adjournment is sought at 02:00 pm that she has other matters fixed at NCDRC today and, thus, could not conclude the cross-examination.
It has been noted in the Order dated 22.8.2022 that the cross-examination be concluded on the next date fixed since the witness has to travel from Hyderabad. One adjournment is granted to the next date fixed according to her convenience.
As jointly prayed by the parties, let the matter be listed on 8th November, 2023 for further cross-examination of the Petitioner's witness. In case of any prayer for adjournment on behalf of either of the parties, it shall be subject to the cost indicated earlier. The Respondent is directed to conclude the cross-examination on the next date when the witness shall be appearing. The Petitioner is directed to produce his witness on the date fixed.
