AI Structured Summary
Not yet generated for this judgment
No AI summary yet
Generate an eight-section analysis of this judgment — facts, issues, reasoning, ratio and a plain-language gist.
Judgment
17 paragraphs · 363 wordsC. Shivappa, J.—Petition is seeking for quashing an order dated 20.3.1987 and seeking for an opportunity to prove that he belongs to
Konda Reddy community. The petitioner claims that he belongs to Scheduled Tribe community called Konda Reddy and a certificate was issued
by the Tahsildar, Thuraiyur. On the basis of the certificate, after completion of the Pie-University education, petitioner joined medical course at
Stanley Medical College. At the instance of the 4th respondent, a letter was written to the 2nd respondent to verify whether the petitioner belongs
to Konda Reddy community. When he was pursuing his studies, a letter was served on the father of the petitioner wherein it has been stated that it
is decided to cancel the certificate of community issued by the 5th respondent. Though the petitioner engaged a counsel, the enquiry before 2nd
respondent was postponed from 22.12.1986 to 2.3.1987 and later an adjournment was promised by the 2nd respondent so as to give him an
opportunity to participate in the enquiry to establish that he belonged to Scheduled Tribe. Without further opportunity, an order was passed and
served on the petitioner indicating that he failed to satisfy that he belonged to Scheduled Tribe. Consequently, the certificate issued by the 5th
respondent was cancelled.
The contention of the petitioner is that he was not provided with sufficient opportunity to establish that he belongs to Konda Reddy community.
The authorities should be vigilant to verify about the caste then and there, at least within a reasonable time. That has not been done. If that is so, the
burden is on the respondents to establish that he does not belong to a particular community. In the impugned order, there is no reference that the
copy of the report was served on the petitioner. The impugned order is set aside. The 2nd respondent is directed to provide an opportunity of
being heard to the petitioner and also supply him a copy of the report and then to decide the community to which the petitioner belongs in
accordance with law and as expeditiously as possible. The impugned order is quashed. The writ petition is allowed. Parties to bear their own
costs.
