AI Structured Summary
Not yet generated for this judgment
No AI summary yet
Generate an eight-section analysis of this judgment — facts, issues, reasoning, ratio and a plain-language gist.
Judgment
9 paragraphs · 130 wordsSanjay K. Agrawal, J
Heard.
This contempt petition has been filed by the petitioner herein, alleging non-compliance of this Court's order dated 02.11.2017 passed in WP No.
2385 of 2006.
After hearing learned counsel appearing for the petitioner, I deem it appropriate to give one opportunity to the respondent/contemnor in the writ
petition No. WP No. 2385 of 2006 to ensure compliance of this Court's order dated 02.11.2017.
The petitioner may also make additional representation along with the copy of this order within ten days from today before the respondent and, in
turn, the respondent in the writ petition shall ensure the compliance of this Court's order dated 02.11.2017 in its letter and spirit expeditiously.
With the aforesaid direction, the contempt case stands finally disposed of.