High CourtsDivision Bench(2005) 07 MAD CK 0015

S. Parthasarathy and Others vs N. Arumugam and Others

Madras High Court · Decided on 27 July 2005 · Citation: (2005) 3 LW 691 : (2005) 3 MLJ 487

HON’BLE JUDGES
A.P. Shah, C.J · F.M. Ibrahim Kalifulla, J
RESULT
Allowed
CASE NUMBER
W.A. No''s. 1115 and 1116 of 2005

AI Structured Summary

Not yet generated for this judgment

Judgment

16 paragraphs · 377 words

F.M. Ibrahim Kalifulla, J.—With the consent of both parties, the writ petition itself is taken up for final hearing.

2.

Petitioner in the writ petition is really aggrieved against an order passed by the competent authority u/s 3 of the Tamil Nadu Protection of

Interests of Depositors (in Financial Establishment) Act, 1997 (Act 44 of 1997). u/s 3, after passing an interim order of attachment, the competent

authority constituted u/s 4 of the Act has to move the appropriate forum, viz. the Special Court constituted u/s 6 of the said Act. Thereafter, the

Special Court will be seized of the matter, who will be dealing with all other subsequent proceedings relating to the manner in which the attachment

order passed u/s 3 of the Act is to be dealt with i.e. either to modify or vary the said order of attachment or even to revoke the same after

analysing the facts and circumstances involved in the case. Sections 8, 9 and 10 of the said Act empowers the Special Court to pass such

appropriate orders depending upon the facts and circumstances involved. Further u/s 11 of the said Act, any person aggrieved by the order of the

Special Court can file an appeal to this Court within thirty days from the date of the order. Having regard to such special procedure prescribed

under the provisions of the above referred to enactment, we are of the firm view that the writ petition is totally misconceived and the same is not

maintainable. The writ petition is liable to be dismissed on the ground of availability of alternative remedy under Act 44 of 1997 particularly when

disputed questions of fact are involved. Therefore, we dismiss the writ petition, reserving the petitioner''s liberty to move the Special Court for the

redressal of the grievances in the manner known to law. Petitioner can move the Special Court within fifteen days from the date of receipt of copy

of this order. The writ petition is accordingly dismissed.

3.

In view of the disposal of the writ petition itself, nothing survives in the writ appeals. The writ appeals are also dismissed.

4.

Connected W.P.M.P. No. 46150 of 2004 and W.A.V.M.P. Nos. 2129 and 2130 and W.A.M.P. Nos. 2013 and 2014 of 2005 are closed.