High CourtsSingle Bench

S R Patalappa vs Bharath D C

Karnataka High Court · Decided on 18 July 2025 · Citation: (2025) 07 KAR CK 0508

HON’BLE JUDGES
S Vishwajith Shetty, J
ACTS & SECTIONS REFERRED
Bharatiya Nyaya Sanhita, 2003 — Section 74, 76, 115(2), 324(4), 324(5), 329(4), 351(2), 351(3), 352 · Bharatiya Nagarik Suraksha Sanhita, 2023 — Section 482
RESULT
Allowed
CASE NUMBER
Criminal Revision Petition No. 56 Of 2025
Ask AI about this case

AI Structured Summary

Not yet generated for this judgment

No AI summary yet

Generate an eight-section analysis of this judgment — facts, issues, reasoning, ratio and a plain-language gist.

Judgment

5 paragraphs · 122 words

Shivashankar Amarannavar, J

1.

The petitioner and his counsel are present.

2.

The respondent and his counsel are present.

3.

Joint memo is filed and it is signed by the petitioner, respondent and their respective counsels. As per terms of the joint memo, the matter is settled for Rs.1,00,000/- (rupees One Lakh only). The petitioner has handed over Demand Draft for Rs.40,000/- and cash of Rs.60,000/- to the respondent –complainant. The respondent –complainant reports receipt of Demand Draft for Rs.40,000/- and cash of Rs.60,000/-.

4.

In view of settlement, the offence punishable under Section 138 of the Negotiable Instruments Act, 1881 is compounded. In view of compounding of the offence, this Criminal Revision Petition is disposed of as the offence is compounded.