AI Structured Summary
Not yet generated for this judgment
No AI summary yet
Generate an eight-section analysis of this judgment — facts, issues, reasoning, ratio and a plain-language gist.
Judgment
7 paragraphs · 264 wordsMr. P.N. Prakash, J. - These petitions are filed seeking a direction to the Metropolitan Magistrate (FTC-III) Saidapet, Chennai, to take up the Calendar Case Nos.1040 of 2015 and 645 of 2015 and dispose the same.
Heard the petitioner/party-in-person.
It is seen that the petitioner has launched two prosecutions viz., C.C. Nos.1040 of 2015 and 645 of 2015 before the Metropolitan Magistrate (Fast Track Court-III) Saidapet, Chennai for an offence under Section 138 of the Negotiable Instruments Act, 1881 (for brevity, _the NI Act_) against one R. Srinivasan.
Admittedly, Srinivasan (accused) has not appeared before the Metropolitan Magistrate (Fast Track Court-III), Saidapet, Chennai, in both the cases. In the meantime, the NI Act was amended and Section 142-A has been included, whereby, the territorial jurisdiction for trial of cases under Section 138 of the NI Act has been fixed in relation to the bank of the complainant.
On account of this, the Metropolitan Magistrate (Fast Track Court-III), Saidapet, Chennai has transferred C.C. No.645 of 2015 and C.C. No.1040 of 2015 to the Court of Judicial Magistrate, Poonamallee.
In view of the above, this Court directs the Judicial Magistrate, Poonamallee to take the transferred cases on file and dispose the same expeditiously, at any rate, within a period of six months from the date of appearance of the accused, as mandated by Section 143 of the NI Act. The Judicial Magistrate, Poonamallee, is directed to follow the mandates of Section 144 of the NI Act for service of summons on the accused.
With the above direction, these petitions are closed.
