High CourtsDivision Bench

Sabik Roy @ Chandan Roy And Anr. vs State

Calcutta High Court · Decided on 6 August 2020 · Citation: (2020) 08 CAL CK 0027

HON’BLE JUDGES
Abhijit Gangopadhyay, J · Joymalya Bagchi, J
ACTS & SECTIONS REFERRED
Code Of Criminal Procedure, 1973 — Section 438(2)
RESULT
Disposed Of
CASE NUMBER
Criminal Misc. Case (Bail Application) (CRM) No. 5130 Of 2020
Ask AI about this case

AI Structured Summary

Not yet generated for this judgment

No AI summary yet

Generate an eight-section analysis of this judgment — facts, issues, reasoning, ratio and a plain-language gist.

Judgment

10 paragraphs · 203 words

Petitioners undertake to affirm and stamp the petition/application as per Rules within a month of resumption of normal functioning of the court. Subject

to such undertaking, the application is taken up for hearing through video conferencing.

Having considered the materials on record and bearing in mind the nature of allegations in the light of the submission that there was a dispute amongst

the neighbours and as the injuries are submitted to be simple by the prosecution, we are of the opinion that custodial interrogation of the

accused/petitioners is not necessary in the facts of the present case and they may be granted anticipatory bail.

Accordingly, we direct that in the event of arrest, the accused/petitioners, namely (1) Sabik Roy @ Chandan Roy & (2) Anita Roy Podder, be

released on bail upon furnishing a bond of Rs.10,000/- (Rupees Ten thousand only) each, with two sureties of like amount each, to the satisfaction of

the arresting officer and also be subject to the conditions as laid down under Section 438(2) of the Code of Criminal Procedure, 1973.

The application for anticipatory bail is, thus, disposed of. All concerned authorities shall act in terms of the copy downloaded from the official website

of this court.