High CourtsSingle Bench

Sachchidanand Modi vs State of Bihar

Patna High Court · Decided on 4 January 2002 · Citation: (2002) CriLJ 4766

HON’BLE JUDGES
Shiva Kirti Singh, J
ACTS & SECTIONS REFERRED
Essential Commodities Act, 1955 — Section 7
RESULT
Allowed
CASE NUMBER
Criminal Miscellaneous No. 34966 of 2000
Ask AI about this case

AI Structured Summary

Not yet generated for this judgment

No AI summary yet

Generate an eight-section analysis of this judgment — facts, issues, reasoning, ratio and a plain-language gist.

Judgment

5 paragraphs · 270 words

Shiva Kirti Singh, J.—Heard learned counsel for the 2002 petitioner and learned counsel for the State.

2.

Petitioner seeks quashing of the entire criminal proceeding pending in the Court of Special Judge, E.C. Act Jamui arising out of Jamui P.S. Case No. 77/99. The allegation against the petitioner is violating of Section 7 of the E.G. Act on the ground that on 8th June, 1999 from the godown of the petitioner 109 quintals of wheat and 1 quintals of sugar was recovered and the petitioner had no licence for trading in these articles.

3.

Learned counsel for the petitioner has relied upon Annexure-2 an order of this Court in another similar case where this Court noticed that storage limit for wheat and rice has been abolished by a notification of the Central Government. Details of such notification are also mentioned in another judgment of this Court in the case of Smt. Kiran Bala v. State of Bihar 1996 (i) PLJR 730.

4.

So far as sugar is concerned, it has been submitted that as per notification contained in notification number G.S.R. 10 dated 15-6-1995, only quantity exceeding five quintals of sugar will make the holder retail dealer for the purpose of Bihar Trade Articles (Licensing Unification) Order, 1984. On the basis of aforesaid submission it has rightly been submitted that petitioner was not required to hold any licence either for wheat or for sugar when the quantity of sugar is less than five quintals.

5.

In the aforesaid facts and circumstances, the prayer made in this writ application is allowed and the criminal prosecution against the petitioner is hereby quashed.