High CourtsSingle Bench

Sacheerome Advanced Technologies (Sat) vs Nec Technologies India Pvt. Ltd. (NECI)

Delhi High Court · Decided on 9 August 2021 · Citation: (2021) 08 DEL CK 0044

HON’BLE JUDGES
Suresh Kumar Kait, J
ACTS & SECTIONS REFERRED
Arbitration And Conciliation Act, 1996 — Section 11, 12, 14(1)(A), 15
RESULT
Disposed Of
CASE NUMBER
Original Miscellaneous Petition (T) (COMM.) No. 74 Of 2021
Ask AI about this case

AI Structured Summary

Not yet generated for this judgment

No AI summary yet

Generate an eight-section analysis of this judgment — facts, issues, reasoning, ratio and a plain-language gist.

Judgment

28 paragraphs · 376 words

Suresh Kumar Kait, J

The hearing has been conducted through video conferencing.

I.A. 9852/2021 (exemption)

1.

Allowed subject to all just exceptions.

2.

The application is disposed of.

I.A. 9853/2021 (exemption)

3.

The application is disposed of with direction to file necessary affidavits within four days of this Court resuming normal functioning.

O.M.P. (T) (COMM.) 74/2021

4.

The present petition has been preferred by the petitioner under the provisions of Section 14 (1) (A) read with Section 15 of the Arbitration and

Conciliation Act, 1996 seeking appointment of substituted Arbitrator, to adjudicate the dispute between the parties.

5.

Learned senior counsel appearing on behalf of petitioner submits that parties had entered into an agreement dated 11.06.2019 consisting of an

arbitration clause/arbitration agreement. Thereafter, disputes had arisen between the parties and in a petition [Arb. Pet. 702 of 2020] preferred by the

petitioner under Section 11 of the Arbitration and Conciliation Act, 1996, Mr. Rajiv Bansal, Senior Advocate, was appointed as Arbitrator. However,

during pendency of the pleadings/ proceedings, the learned Arbitrator met with his unfortunate demise on 17.05.2021 and so, another Arbitrator has to

be appointed in this case. Learned senior counsel for petitioner further submits that arbitration proceedings were in progress and pleadings were in

mid-way, therefore, the entire proceedings be not conducted afresh and the proceedings may continue further.

6.

Notice issued.

7.

Ms. Satya Jha, Advocate, accepts notice on behalf of respondent and submits that the present petition seeking appointment of another Arbitrator is

not disputed.

8.

Keeping in view that after demise of Mr.Rajiv Bansal, Senior Advocate, appointment of a substituted Arbitrator is not disputed, the present petition

is allowed.

9.

Accordingly, Ms. Radhika Biswajit Dubey, Advocate (Mobile: 9810982927) is appointed Sole Arbitrator to adjudicate the dispute between the

parties.

10.

The fee of the learned Arbitrator shall be governed by the Fourth Schedule of the Arbitration and Conciliation Act, 1996.

11.

The learned Arbitrator shall ensure compliance of Section 12 of Arbitration and Conciliation Act, 1996 before commencing the arbitration.

12.

Needless to say the pleadings/proceedings before the Arbitral Tribunal shall resume where it were left.

13.

A copy of this order be transmitted/sent to the learned Arbitrator for information.

14.

With aforesaid directions, the present petition is accordingly disposed of.