High CourtsSINGLE BENCH

Sachithanandam vs R.Sornam, & Anr.

Madras High Court · Decided on 10 November 2017 · Citation: (2017) 11 MAD CK 0061

HON’BLE JUDGES
M.Duraiswamy
CASE NUMBER
964 of 2015 & M P No 1 of 2015
Ask AI about this case

AI Structured Summary

Not yet generated for this judgment

No AI summary yet

Generate an eight-section analysis of this judgment — facts, issues, reasoning, ratio and a plain-language gist.

Judgment

5 paragraphs · 187 words
1.

Pursuant to the orders of this Court, the appellant and the 1st respondent appeared before the Mediation and Conciliation Centre, High Court of Madras, Chennai on 09.11.2017 and had settled the matter by filing a memorandum of compromise dated 08.11.2017.

2.

The Mediation and Conciliation Centre also recorded that the parties had settled the matter as per the terms cited in the Mediation Agreement.

3.

Mr.V.Raghavachari, learned counsel appearing for the appellant submitted that since the dispute between the parties has been settled, the Registry may be directed to refund the court fee paid by the appellant.

4.

In view of the same, the Appeal stands disposed of in terms of the memorandum of compromise dated 09.11.2017 and the terms of the compromise shall form part and parcel of the decree in the above Appeal.

5.

The Registry is directed to refund the court fee paid in the Fist Appeal to the appellant. The Registry is also directed to hand over the cheque to the appellant or his agent identified by the learned counsel appearing for the appellant. No costs. Consequently, connected miscellaneous petition is closed.