AI Structured Summary
Not yet generated for this judgment
No AI summary yet
Generate an eight-section analysis of this judgment — facts, issues, reasoning, ratio and a plain-language gist.
Judgment
6 paragraphs · 126 wordsArindam Sinha, J
Mr. Pattanayak, learned advocate appears on behalf of petitioner and submits, prayer of his client is for relief of compensation. His client had made, inter alia, representation dated 14th October, 2021 to opposite party no.4, copy of which is at page 24 of the writ petition.
Mr. Panda, learned advocate, Additional Government Advocate appears on behalf of State and submits, proper authority to consider petitioner’s claim is opposite party no.2.
Petitioner is directed to approach opposite party no.2 with copy of said representation dated 14th Opposite party no.2 is directed October, 2021 and this order. to consider and deal with the representation and inform petitioner the result within three weeks of communication.
The writ petition is disposed of.
...........................................
