High CourtsSingle Bench

Sadananda Jash vs Shibakali Hazra

Calcutta High Court · Decided on 22 July 1953 · Citation: AIR 1954 Cal 288

HON’BLE JUDGES
Chunder, J
ACTS & SECTIONS REFERRED
Penal Code, 1860 (IPC) — Section 504, 506, 95
CASE NUMBER
Criminal Revn. No. 336 of 1953

AI Structured Summary

Not yet generated for this judgment

No AI summary yet

Generate an eight-section analysis of this judgment — facts, issues, reasoning, ratio and a plain-language gist.

Judgment

5 paragraphs · 374 words

Chunder, J.—This Rule was issued at the instance of a school-master against an order of the Additional District Magistrate of Burdwan acquitting the" opposite party of an offence u/s 504, Penal Code. Although it is a revision I have been compelled by Mr. Panchanan Chaudhuri with his usual eloquence to hear what was really a full appeal on facts and law against the acquittal. I am of the same opinion as the learned District Magistrate and hold that the accused was rightly acquitted.

2.

Briefly the facts are that between the complainant''s brother and the accused there was a criminal case over a land dispute and In the course of a conversation in connection therewith for arriving at a compromise of the case before the Head Master of the school an occurrence took place. The learned District Magistrate points out that the only reliable witness in the case Is the Head Master who being the head of an educational institution deserves to be fully believed. The Head Master''s version is that in the course of the conversation in a very mild manner the accused told the school master "Apni nichhe katha bol-chhen" (you are telling a lie). For this the school master rushed to the Criminal Court and filed a complaint u/s 504, Penal Code. The learned District Magistrate exercised his commonsense and acquitted the accused though a Magistrate of the second class had convicted him.

3.

One of the first principles of law is ''de minimis non curat lex''. This has found expression in Section 95, Penal Code which enacts that

"nothing is an offence by reason that it causes, or that it has intended to cause, or that it is known to be likely to cause, any harm, if that harm is so slight that no person of ordinary sense and temper would complain of such harm."

This is a complete Justification for what the learned District Magistrate has done. Intercourse in civilised society will come to an end if for words uttered as in the present case, a person found himself exposed to all the trouble and worry of a criminal trial. The order of the learned Additional District Magistrate being right, the Rule for setting aside the acquittal is discharged.