High CourtsDivision Bench

Sadat Ali and Another vs Fakir Bakhsh

Allahabad High Court · Decided on 23 February 1885 · Citation: (1885) ILR (All) 376

HON’BLE JUDGES
Oldfield, J · Brodhurst, J
RESULT
Allowed
Ask AI about this case

AI Structured Summary

Not yet generated for this judgment

No AI summary yet

Generate an eight-section analysis of this judgment — facts, issues, reasoning, ratio and a plain-language gist.

Judgment

3 paragraphs · 142 words

Oldfield, J.—The plaintiffs are some of several co-mortgagors, and sue to redeem the entire property mortgaged, on the ground that the mortgage-debt has been satisfied out of the usufruct. The Courts below have decreed the claim. The only point taken in appeal by the mortgagee in this appeal, and by one of the co-mortgagors who had been made a party to the suit as a defendant, is that the plaintiffs can only obtain possession of their shares of the property.

2.

It appears to us that this contention has force. The debt having been satisfied from the usufruct, the plaintiffs can only claim their own shares, and the Court below should determine the extent of the shares after making the other co-mortgagors parties.

3.

The case is remanded in order that the issue be tried. Ten days will be allowed for objections.