Supreme CourtSingle Bench

Sadhika & Ors. vs Neeraj Shrivastav & Anr.

Supreme Court Of India · Decided on 24 September 2021 · Citation: (2021) 09 SC CK 0119

HON’BLE JUDGES
Hima Kohli, J
RESULT
Disposed Of
CASE NUMBER
Transfer Petition (Civil) No. 2792 Of 2019
Ask AI about this case

AI Structured Summary

Not yet generated for this judgment

No AI summary yet

Generate an eight-section analysis of this judgment — facts, issues, reasoning, ratio and a plain-language gist.

Judgment

4 paragraphs · 163 words

Learned counsel for the petitioner-wife and the respondent-husband who appears in person and has been identified by the learned counsel for the petitioner, state in unison that during the pendency of the present petition, the parties have resolved their inter se disputes and have reunited. Now, the petitioner-wife and the respondent-husband are residing together at Jabalpur, Madhya Pradesh. In view of the above development, learned counsel for the petitioner stated that he does not wish to press the present transfer petition. He further states that his client has withdrawn the divorce petition and the maintenance petition filed against the respondent-husband before the competent Court at Amritsar.

The respondent is directed to take necessary steps to withdraw the writ petition filed by him before the High Court of Madhya Pradesh at Jabalpur seeking visitation rights in respect of the son of the parties within one week.

The present Transfer Petition is, accordingly, disposed of as withdrawn.

Interim order dated 16th July, 2020 stands vacated.