High CourtsSingle Bench

Sagar Prajapati vs State Of Madhya Pradesh

Madhya Pradesh High Court · Decided on 6 March 2026 · Citation: (2026) 03 MP CK 0781

HON’BLE JUDGES
Pramod Kumar Agrawal, J
ACTS & SECTIONS REFERRED
Bharatiya Nagarik Suraksha Sanhita, 2023 — Section 480(3), 483 · Bharatiya Nyaya Sanhita, 2023 — Section 3(5), 103, 115(2), 117(2), 296, 351(3)
RESULT
Allowed
CASE NUMBER
Miscellaneous Criminal Case No. 9080 Of 2026
Ask AI about this case

AI Structured Summary

Not yet generated for this judgment

No AI summary yet

Generate an eight-section analysis of this judgment — facts, issues, reasoning, ratio and a plain-language gist.

Judgment

9 paragraphs · 414 words

Pramod Kumar Agrawal, J

1.

This is repeat (second) application filed by the applicant under Section 483 of B.N.S.S., for grant of regular bail, who is in custody relating to Crime No.98/2025 registered at Police Station - Kotma, District Anuppur (M.P.) for the offence punishable under Section 103, 296, 115(2), 117(2), 351(3) and 3(5) of B.N.S. Applicant's first application was dismissed on merits on 09.09.2025.

2.

As per the prosecution story, it is alleged that applicant alongwith co-accused persons abused and committed marpeet with the complainant and the deceased by means of lathi due to which they sustained injuries on their vital body parts. During treatment, the deceased died. Therefore, the offence has been registered against the present applicant and co-accused persons under the aforesaid section.

3.

Learned counsel for the applicant submits that applicant is innocent and has been falsely implicated in this case. It is submitted that the statements of injured and other eye witnesses have been recorded before the trial Court and they have not supported the prosecution story. It is also submitted that co-accused person namely Surya Chandra Prajapati has been released on bail vide order dated 17.02.2026 passed in M.Cr.C.No.6100 of 2026. The conclusion of the trial will take considerable time, therefore, it has been prayed that the applicant be released on bail.

4.

On the other hand, learned counsel for the respondent/State has opposed the bail application and prayed for it's rejection.

5.

Having taken into consideration all the facts and circumstances of the case, but without commenting on merit of the case, I am inclined to release the applicant on bail. Consequently, bail application under Section 483 of B.N.S.S. for grant of bail filed on behalf of applicant, stands allowed.

6.

It is directed that applicant be released on bail on his furnishing a personal bond in the sum of Rs.50,000/- (Rupees Fifty Thousand only) with one solvent surety in the like amount to the satisfaction of the trial Court, for his regular appearance before the trial Court during trial with a condition that he shall remain present before the concerned Court on all the dates fixed by it during trial and is directed to cooperate in trial. He shall abide by all the conditions enumerated under Section 480(3) of B.N.S.S.

7.

This order shall be effective till the end of the trial. However, in case of bail jump and breach of any of the conditions of bail, it shall become ineffective.

Certified copy as per rules.