High CourtsSingle Bench

Sahabddin vs State Of Haryana And Others

Punjab And Haryana At Chandigarh · Decided on 20 May 2022 · Citation: (2022) 05 P&H CK 0091

HON’BLE JUDGES
Anoop Chitkara, J
RESULT
Disposed Of
CASE NUMBER
Criminal Writ Petition No. 4819 Of 2022

AI Structured Summary

Not yet generated for this judgment

Judgment

4 paragraphs · 127 words

Anoop Chitkara, J

After hearing the parties, it would be appropriate that the detenue Shehruna is produced before the Illaqa Magistrate/Duty Magistrate, Nuh, who shall interact with the detenue and in case, the Magistrate so desires, he may record her fresh statement under Section 164 Cr.P.C.. It shall be for the Magistrate to take appropriate decision after interacting with the detenue.

The detenue shall inform the investigator about the time at which she wants to give her statement. The investigator to co-ordinate with the detenue in this regard. However, in case, the detenue does not intimate about the time then it shall not be obligatory to the investigator to get her statement recorded.

The present petition is disposed of. All pending applications, if any, stand disposed of.