High CourtsDivision Bench

Sahadat Khan vs Taijaddi Sheikh

Calcutta High Court · Decided on 8 May 1919 · Citation: 52 Ind. Cas. 608

HON’BLE JUDGES
Walmsley, J · Syed Shamsul Huda, J
ACTS & SECTIONS REFERRED
Criminal Procedure Code, 1898 (CrPC) — Section 145

AI Structured Summary

Not yet generated for this judgment

No AI summary yet

Generate an eight-section analysis of this judgment — facts, issues, reasoning, ratio and a plain-language gist.

Judgment

1 paragraphs · 121 words
1.

The ground on which this Rule was issued was that the learned Magistrate had acted without jurisdiction in passing the order under, Section 145, Code of Criminal Procedure, without taking any evidence whatever. The explanation submitted by the Magistrate and the affidavit filed by the opposite party do not afford sufficient justification for the order. The Magistrate was doubtless invited to go to the spot. But that invitation did not mean that he was to dispose of the case without recording any evidence whatever. We think in this case that the Magistrate acted without jurisdiction (and the order must be set aside). We make no order as to any farther proceedings because that lies outside the scope of our functions.