High CourtsSingle Bench

Saiju vs State Of Kerala

High Court Of Kerala · Decided on 20 March 2023 · Citation: (2023) 03 KL CK 0184

HON’BLE JUDGES
Dr. Kauser Edappagath, J
ACTS & SECTIONS REFERRED
Code of Criminal Procedure, 1973 — Section 439 · Indian Penal Code, 1860 — Section 34, 294(b), 308, 323, 324, 427, 506(ii)
RESULT
Dismissed
CASE NUMBER
Bail Application No. 1592 Of 2023
Ask AI about this case

AI Structured Summary

Not yet generated for this judgment

No AI summary yet

Generate an eight-section analysis of this judgment — facts, issues, reasoning, ratio and a plain-language gist.

Judgment

16 paragraphs · 505 words

Dr Kauser Edappagath, J

1.

This application is filed u/s 439 of the Code of Criminal Procedure seeking regular bail.

2.

The applicant is the accused No.1 in Crime No.886/2022 of Varkala Police Station. The offences alleged are punishable under Sections 294(b), 308, 323, 324, 427, 506(ii) read with 34 of the IPC.

3.

The prosecution case, in short, is as follows:

On 5.7.2022 at 11.30 pm, in front of Zam Zam restaurant at Puthenchanda Desom, the applicant along with the remaining accused, with common intention, uttered obscene words against the defacto complainant and his friends and further voluntarily caused hurt to him with a key as well as with a knife with intention to kill him and thereby committed the offences.

4.

I have heard Sri. Latheesh Sebastian, the learned counsel for the applicant and Sri. P.G. Manu, the learned Senior Public Prosecutor. Perused the case diary.

5.

The learned counsel for the applicant submitted that the applicant is innocent and has been falsely implicated in the present case. The counsel further submitted that no materials are on record to connect the applicant with the alleged crime; hence, he is entitled to get bail. On the other hand, the learned Public Prosecutor submitted that the alleged incident occurred as a part of the intentional criminal acts of the applicant, and he is not entitled to bail at this stage.

6.

The applicant was remanded to judicial custody on 5.2.2023. The overt act alleged against the applicant is that he hit on the right eyebrow portion of the defacto complainant with a key of the bike. The wound certificate does not show any serious injury. The investigation is almost over. For all these reasons, I do not find any reason to hold that the continued detention of the applicant is required for any purpose. Hence, the applicant is entitled to be released on bail.

In the result, the application is allowed on the following conditions: -

(i) The applicant shall be released on bail on executing a bond for Rs.1,00,000/- (Rupees One lakh only) with two solvent sureties for the like sum each to the satisfaction of the jurisdictional Magistrate/Court.

(ii) The applicant shall fully co-operate with the investigation.

(iii) The applicant shall appear before the investigating officer between 10.00 a.m and 11.00 a.m. on every Saturday until further orders. He shall also appear before the investigating officer as and when required.

(iv) The applicant shall not commit any offence of a like nature while on bail.

(v) The applicant shall not attempt to contact any of the prosecution witnesses, directly or through any other person, or in any other way try to tamper with the evidence or influence any witnesses or other persons related to the investigation.

(vi) The applicant shall not leave the State of Kerala without the permission of the trial Court.

(vii) The application, if any, for deletion/modification of the bail conditions or cancellation of bail on the grounds of violating the bail conditions shall be filed at the jurisdictional court.