High CourtsSingle Bench

Sajitha M vs T.P.Riyas, S/o.Kunjayi

High Court Of Kerala · Decided on 22 October 2021 · Citation: (2021) 10 KL CK 0130

HON’BLE JUDGES
T.R.Ravi, J
RESULT
Allowed
CASE NUMBER
M.A.C.A.No. 552 Of 2012
Ask AI about this case

AI Structured Summary

Not yet generated for this judgment

No AI summary yet

Generate an eight-section analysis of this judgment — facts, issues, reasoning, ratio and a plain-language gist.

Judgment

6 paragraphs · 600 words

T.R.Ravi, J

1.

The appeal is filed by the claimant. The appellant's minor daughter succumbed to an accident, which was caused by rash and negligent driving by the 2nd respondent, of a bus belonging to the 1st respondent. The minor child was 9 years old at the time of her death. The accident happened on 12.11.2004. The Tribunal awarded a sum of Rs.77,000/- as compensation. Aggrieved by the quantum of the compensation, the claimant has filed this appeal.

2.

The main contention raised by the counsel for the appellant is that the Tribunal went wrong in assessing the compensation under the head loss of dependency as Rs.50,000/-. The counsel submits that going by the decision of this Court in National Insurance Company Limited V. Assainar reported in [2019 (4) KLT 39], in the case of a minor who died in an accident in the year 2004-2005, a sum of Rs.41,000/- should be taken as the annual income and the multiplier of '15' should be adopted to arrive at the compensation for loss of dependency. It is submitted that one third of the amount is to be deducted towards own expenses of the deceased. The counsel further submits that the Tribunal ought to have granted a sum of Rs.15,000/- towards funeral expenses in the place of Rs.3,000/- and a sum of Rs.15,000/- towards loss of estate. It is further submitted that the amount awarded under the head loss of love and affection is also very less. The counsel for the Insurance Company submitted that as far as loss of consortium is concerned, the amount is liable to be enhanced by a sum of Rs.30,000/-. However, it is submitted that the amount of Rs.10,000/- awarded by the Tribunal towards pain and suffering of the victim is not warranted since the legal representatives cannot claim compensation under the above said head. The above submission is justified.

3.

Having considered the rival contentions, I am of the opinion that the amount awarded by the Tribunal has to be modified in the following manner:

4.

An additional sum of Rs.12,000/- is to be awarded towards funeral expenses. A sum of Rs.15,000/- is to be awarded towards loss of estate. The amount of Rs.10,000/- awarded towards pain and suffering has to be deducted from the total compensation. The appellant is entitled to an amount of Rs.4,10,000/- towards loss of dependency and after deducting the sum of Rs.50,000/- which has already been awarded, the appellant is entitled to a sum of Rs.3,60,000/- in addition. An additional sum of Rs.30,000/- is to be granted towards loss of love an affection. The appeal was filed with a delay of 369 days. The delay was condoned by order dated 22.03.2012 on condition that the enhanced compensation which may be allowed will not carry interest for the period of 369 days.

5.

In the result, the award passed by the Tribunal is modified. The appellant will be entitled to an additional compensation of Rs.4,07,000/- (Four Lakhs Seven Thousand only) with interest at the rate of 9% per annum from the date of filing the petition till the date of realisation, with proportionate costs, excluding the period of delay of 369 days. The 3rd respondent insurer shall deposit the additional compensation granted in this appeal along with the interest and proportionate costs, before the Tribunal within two months from the date of receipt of a certified copy of this judgment, after deducting any amount to which the appellant is liable towards balance court fee and legal benefit fund. The disbursement of the compensation to the appellant shall be in accordance with law.