High CourtsSingle Bench(2020) 03 RAJ CK 0063

Sajjan Singh and Others vs Gajendra Singh and Another

Rajasthan High Court · Decided on 5 March 2020

HON’BLE JUDGES
Arun Bhansali, J
CASE NUMBER
Civil Writ Petition No. 2700 Of 2020

AI Structured Summary

Not yet generated for this judgment

Judgment

10 paragraphs · 148 words

Arun Bhansali, J

1.

It is submitted by learned counsel for the petitioners that the Board of Revenue though may be justified in coming to the conclusion that Order XLI,

Rule 27 CPC would not apply in a revision petition pending before it, however, the application could have been dealt with under other provisions like

Section 151 CPC, which are very much applicable and without going into the merit of the application, the same has been rejected as not maintainable,

which is not justified.

2.

In view of the submissions made, issue notice. Issue notice of stay application as well. Both the notices are made returnable within a period of four

weeks.

3.

Notices when issued be given ‘dasti’ to counsel for the petitioners.

4.

In the meanwhile and till further orders, further proceedings in revision petition No. 6002/2018 being before the Board of Revenue shall remain

stayed.