AI Structured Summary
Not yet generated for this judgment
No AI summary yet
Generate an eight-section analysis of this judgment — facts, issues, reasoning, ratio and a plain-language gist.
Judgment
12 paragraphs · 215 wordsManoj Kumar Tiwari, J
Heard learned counsel for the parties through video conferencing.
According to the petitioners, they were in cultivatory possession of land comprised in Village Diyodi, Up Tehsil Nanakmatta, District Udham Singh
Nagar and name of father of the petitioners was also entered in the revenue record in respect of said land. Petitioner is aggrieved by an order dated
03.07.2019, whereby said land has been given in the custody of one Shri Pradeep Singh S/o Mahendra Singh.
Learned counsel for the petitioner submits that the said land was originally recorded as category 4 land, which was erroneously shown as category
5(3). He further submits that Government has issued orders for regularization of possession of occupants over category 4 land. He further submits
that the act of revenue authorities in handing over possession of the land in question in the custody of Pradeep Singh is absolutely unjustified, as
petitioner had a right to cultivate the said land.
Without expressing any opinion on the final merits of the claim made by the petitioners, writ petition is disposed of with liberty to the petitioners to
make a joint representation to the S.D.M. concerned. If such representation is made within two weeks from today, decision thereupon shall be taken
within six weeks thereafter.