High CourtsSingle Bench

Sakir Hasan vs State of Uttarakhand

Uttarakhand High Court · Decided on 28 August 2018 · Citation: (2018) 08 UK CK 0155

HON’BLE JUDGES
Sudhanshu Dhulia, J
ACTS & SECTIONS REFERRED
Indian Penal Code, 1860 — Section, 34, 417, 420
RESULT
Allowed
CASE NUMBER
First Bail Application No. 1090 of 2018
Ask AI about this case

AI Structured Summary

Not yet generated for this judgment

No AI summary yet

Generate an eight-section analysis of this judgment — facts, issues, reasoning, ratio and a plain-language gist.

Judgment

13 paragraphs · 188 words

Sudhanshu Dhulia, J. (Oral)

Heard Ms. Monika Pant, Advocate, holding brief of Mr. D.N. Sharma Advocate for the accused applicant, and Mr. Pramod Tiwari, Brief Holder for

the State.

The applicant is in jail having been implicated in Case Crime No. 109 of 2018 for the offences under Sections 417, 420, 34 IPC, registered in the

Police Station Nanakmatta, District Udham Singh Nagar.

It is contended that the applicant has been falsely implicated in the present case and false recovery has been shown. Applicant is in jail since

21.4.2018.

Considering the overall materials presently available before this Court, prima facie the applicant has been able to make out a case for bail. The bail

application is allowed accordingly.

Let the applicant be enlarged on bail in the aforesaid crime on his executing a personal bond and two reliable sureties, each in the like amount, to the

satisfaction of the Magistrate/Court concerned.

It is made clear that any observation made by this Court is only for the purpose of deciding the present bail application and the same shall not be taken

into consideration at all in any other proceedings.