High CourtsSingle Bench(2020) 12 JH CK 0044

Salamtulla Ansari @ Salamtullah Ansari @ Md. Salam Tullah Ansari vs State Of Jharkhand

Jharkhand High Court · Decided on 10 December 2020

HON’BLE JUDGES
Anil Kumar Choudhary, J
RESULT
Allowed
CASE NUMBER
Bail Application No. 9580 Of 2020

AI Structured Summary

Not yet generated for this judgment

Judgment

16 paragraphs · 357 words

Heard the parties through video conferencing. Learned counsel for the petitioner personally undertakes to remove the defects as pointed out by the

stamp reporter within two weeks after the lockdown period is over.

In view of the personal undertaking of the learned counsel for the petitioner, the defects pointed out by the stamp reporter are ignored for the present.

The petitioner has moved this Court for grant of bail in connection with Amrapara P.S. Case No.65 of 2018 registered under sections 376 of the

Indian Penal Code and under Section 4/8 of POCSO Act.

The learned counsel for the petitioner submits that the allegation against the petitioner is that the petitioner has committed rape upon the victim minor

girl. It is further submitted that the allegations against the petitioner are all false and in her statement recorded under Section 164 Cr.P.C., the victim

has categorically stated that on the relevant night, the petitioner attempted to commit rape upon her. It is next submitted that the petitioner was given

the privilege of anticipatory bail in A.B.A. No.2609 of 2019 upon his undertaking to pay Rs.2,25,000/- as ad interim victim compensation to the victim

but the petitioner could not arrange money hence, he could not surrender in terms of the said order. It is next submitted that the petitioner has been in

custody since 19.07.2020 as has been mentioned in paragraph no. 1 of the bail application. It is lastly submitted that the petitioner undertakes to

cooperate with the trial of the case. Hence, it is submitted that the petitioner be admitted to bail.

The learned Spl. P.P. opposes the prayer for bail. Considering the submissions of the counsels and the fact as discussed above, I am inclined to

enlarge the above named petitioner on bail. Accordingly, the petitioner is directed to be released on bail on furnishing bail bond of Rs. 25,000/- (Rupees

Twenty Five Thousand) with two sureties of the like amount each to the satisfaction of learned Additional Sessions Judge-I-cum-Special Judge

POCSO, Pakur, in connection with Amrapara P.S. Case No.65 of 2018 with the condition that the petitioner will cooperate with the trial of the case.