High CourtsSingle Bench

Salimsha Husainsha Divan vs State Of Gujarat

Gujarat High Court · Decided on 20 June 2023 · Citation: (2023) 06 GUJ CK 0092

HON’BLE JUDGES
Nirzar S. Desai, J
ACTS & SECTIONS REFERRED
Scheduled Caste And Scheduled Tribe (Prevention Of Atrocities) Act, 1989 — Section 3(1)(R)(S), 3(2)(5)(a), 3(2)(5), 14(A) · Indian Penal Code, 1860 — Section 114, 302, 323, 504 · Code Of Criminal Procedure, 1973 — Section 439
RESULT
Allowed
CASE NUMBER
R/Criminal Appeal No. 868 Of 202
Ask AI about this case

AI Structured Summary

Not yet generated for this judgment

No AI summary yet

Generate an eight-section analysis of this judgment — facts, issues, reasoning, ratio and a plain-language gist.

Judgment

23 paragraphs · 691 words

Nirzar S. Desai, J

1.

By way of this appeal filed under section 14 of the Scheduled Caste and Scheduled Tribes (Prevention of Atrocities) Act read with under Section 439 of the Code of Criminal Procedure, 1973, for regular bail in connection with FIR being C.R.No. 11211055220184 of 2022 registered with Wadhwan Police Station, District: Surendranagar for the offences punishable under Sections 302, 323, 504, 114 of the Indian Penal Code, section 135 of the Gujarat Police Act and under sections 3 (1) (R) (S), 3 (2) (5) (a), 3 (2) (5) of Schedules Caste and Scheduled Tribe (Prevention of Atrocities) Amendments Act, 2015.

2.

Learned Advocate for of the applicant submits that considering the nature of the offence, the applicant may be enlarged on regular bail by imposing suitable conditions.

3.

Learned Additional Public Prosecutor appearing on behalf of the respondent-State has opposed grant of regular bail looking to the nature and gravity of the offence.

4.

Learned Advocates appearing on behalf of the respective parties do not press for further reasoned order.

5.

Having heard the learned advocates for the parties and perusing the material placed on record and taking into consideration the facts of the case, nature of allegations, gravity of offences, role attributed to the accused, without discussing the evidence in detail, this Court is of the opinion that this is a fit case to exercise the discretion and enlarge the applicant on regular bail.

6.

This Court has considered following aspects:-

(a) The applicant is in jail since 29.06.2022.

(b) Investigation is over and charge-sheet is filed.

(c) Co-accused - Jakir Abbasbhai Multani against whom also identical role is alleged is already granted bail by Coordinate Bench vide order dated 06.02.2023 in Criminal Appeal No. 94 of 2023.

(d) Though the present applicant is convicted in one of the offences, there only a fine of Rs. 1000/- is imposed upon the present applicant.

In the facts and circumstances of the present case, I am inclined to consider the case of the present applicant.

7.

This Court has also taken into consideration the law laid down by the Hon'ble Apex Court in the case of Sanjay Chandra Vs. Central Bureau of Investigation, reported in [2012] 1 SCC 40.

8.

Hence, the present application is allowed. The applicant is ordered to be released on regular bail in connection with FIR being C.R.No. 11211055220184 of 2022 registered with Wadhwan Police Station, District: Surendranagar on executing a personal bond of Rs.10,000/- (Rupees Ten Thousand only) with one surety of the like amount to the satisfaction of the trial Court and subject to the conditions that the applicant shall;

[a] not take undue advantage of liberty or misuse liberty;

[b] not act in a manner injurious to the interest of the prosecution;

[c] surrender passport, if any, to the lower court within a week;

[d] not leave the India without prior permission of the concerned trial court;

[e] mark presence before the concerned Police Station between 1st to 10th day of every English calendar month for a period of six months between 11:00 a.m. and 2:00 p.m.;

[f] furnish the present address of residence to the Investigating Officer and also to the Court at the time of execution of the bond and shall not change the residence without prior permission of the concerned trial court;

The authorities shall adhere to its own Circular relating to COVID-19 and, thereafter, will release the applicant only if the applicant is not required in connection with any other offence for the time being. If breach of any of the above conditions is committed, the Sessions Judge concerned will be free to issue warrant or take appropriate action in the matter. Bail bond to be executed before the lower Court having jurisdiction to try the case. It will be open for the concerned Sessions Court to delete, modify and/or relax any of the above conditions, in accordance with law.

9.

At the trial, the Trial Court shall not be influenced by the prima facie observations made by this Court in the present order.

10.

Rule is made absolute to the aforesaid extent. Direct service is permitted.