AI Structured Summary
Not yet generated for this judgment
No AI summary yet
Generate an eight-section analysis of this judgment — facts, issues, reasoning, ratio and a plain-language gist.
Judgment
20 paragraphs · 388 wordsArvind Singh Sangwan, J
This petition has been filed under Section 439 of the Code of Criminal Procedure for grant of regular bail to the petitioner in case FIR No. 117 dated
02.08.2020, registered under Sections 406, 420 and 506 of the IPC (Section 120-B added later on) at Police Station Sadhaura, District Yamuna Nagar.
Learned counsel for the petitioner submits as per the allegations in the FIR, co-accused Karamjeet Kaur entered into an agreement to sell on
14.05.2019 for sale of agricultural land in favour of the complainant and received an amount of Rs. 21 Lakh as earnest money in few installments. The
stipulated date for execution of sale deed was also extended by receiving the earnest money in installments. Later on, the complainant was informed
by Karamjeet Kaur that Deputy Commissioner has granted stay over the land and she cannot execute the sale deed. It is further stated in FIR that
complainant, thereafter, came to know that Karamjeet Kaur has already entered into a previous agreement to sell with one Sachin Kumar on
12.03.2017, who has also filed a suit for specific performance of said agreement to sell. Thus, the complainant was cheated of Rs. 21 Lakh by co-
accused Karamjeet Kaur.
Learned counsel for the petitioner further submits that the allegation against the petitioner is that he is a witness to the said agreement to sell, however,
there is no such allegation that he has identified any wrong person.
Learned counsel further submits that petitioner is not the beneficiary of the said agreement to sell; he is in judicial custody since 22.09.2020 and his
custodial interrogation is no more required.
Learned State counsel has not disputed the factual position, however, submitted that after the anticipatory bail application of co-accused Karamjeet
Kaur was dismissed by this Court, vide order dated 25.09.2020 passed in CRM-M-29676-2020, she could not be arrested so far.
I have heard learned counsel for the parties.
Without commenting upon the merits of the case, considering the fact that the only allegation against the petitioner is that he is a witness to said
agreement to sell and he is in judicial custody since 22.09.2020; the instant petition is allowed. The petitioner is ordered to be released on regular bail
on his furnishing bail/surety bonds to the satisfaction of the trial Court/Duty Magistrate/Illaqa Magistrate, concerned.
