High CourtsDivision Bench

Samarendra Narendra vs State Of Orissa And Others

Orissa High Court · Decided on 12 September 2022 · Citation: (2022) 09 OHC CK 0073

HON’BLE JUDGES
Jaswant Singh, J · M.S. Raman, J
RESULT
Dismissed
CASE NUMBER
Writ Petition (C) Nos. 17168, 11862, 16430, 17169 Of 2015

AI Structured Summary

Not yet generated for this judgment

Judgment

6 paragraphs · 173 words

These matters are taken up through virtual/physical mode.

1.

The petitioners in all the above four Writ Petitions were licensees of their Beer Parlours for retail sale of Beer at different places of the State, as described in the Writ Petitions. They have laid challenge to Clause 4.2.2 of the Excise Policy for the Excise Year 2015-16, whereby it was directed that all Beer Parlours were to convert to IMFL ‘ON’ Shop (Hotel/Restaurants) with effect from 01.04.2015 or close their operations.

2.

At the time of hearing, learned counsel for the parties are agreed that the present Writ Petitions have become infructuous in view of the aforesaid offending Clause of the Excise Policy having already been struck down in a bunch of Writ Petitions with the lead case of W.P.(C) No.13328 of 2015 (Sanghamitra Dash Vs. State of Orissa), decided on 24th December, 2015.

3.

In view of the above, the Writ Petitions are dismissed as infructuous.

Registry is directed to attach the photocopy of this order in all the connected cases.

................................................