High CourtsSingle Bench

Samrat Das And Others vs State Of Jharkhand

Jharkhand High Court · Decided on 1 September 2021 · Citation: (2021) 09 JH CK 0005

HON’BLE JUDGES
Anil Kumar Choudhary, J
ACTS & SECTIONS REFERRED
Indian Penal Code, 1860 — Section 120B, 413, 414 · Coal Mines (Nationalisation) Act, 1973 — Section 30 · Mines And Minerals (Development And Regulation) Act, 1957 — Section 4, 21 · Code Of Criminal Procedure, 1973 — Section 438(2)
CASE NUMBER
A.B.A. No. 6160 Of 2021
Ask AI about this case

AI Structured Summary

Not yet generated for this judgment

No AI summary yet

Generate an eight-section analysis of this judgment — facts, issues, reasoning, ratio and a plain-language gist.

Judgment

8 paragraphs · 402 words

Anil Kumar Choudhary , J

Heard the parties through video conferencing.

Learned counsel for the petitioners undertakes to remove the defects pointed out by the stamp reporter within two weeks after the lockdown is over.

In view of personal undertaking given by the learned counsel for the petitioners, the defects pointed out by the stamp reporter are ignored for the present.

Apprehending their arrest in connection with Nirsa P.S. Case No. 152 of 2021 instituted under Sections 413, 414, 120-B of the Indian Penal Code, Section 30 of Coal Mines(Nationalization) Act and Section 4/21 of M.M.D.R. Act, the petitioners have moved this Court for grant of privileges of anticipatory bail.

Learned counsel appearing for the petitioners submits that the allegation against the petitioners is that the petitioners along with the co-accused persons were involved in illegal mining of coal. It is submitted that the allegation against the petitioners is false. Drawing attention of this Court towards para-11 of the instant anticipatory bail application, learned counsel for the petitioners submits that the petitioners have no criminal antecedent. It is lastly submitted that the petitioners are ready and willing to co-operate with the investigation of the case and to furnish sufficient security including cash security. Hence, it is submitted that the petitioners be given the privileges of anticipatory bail.

Learned Spl.P.P appearing for the State opposes the prayer for anticipatory bail of the petitioners.

Considering the submissions of learned counsels and the facts and circumstances stated above, I am inclined to grant privileges of anticipatory bail to the petitioners. Accordingly, the petitioners are directed to surrender in the Court within six weeks from today and in the event of their arrest or surrendering, they will be enlarged on bail on depositing Rs.5,000/-(Rupees five thousand) each as cash security and on furnishing bail bond of Rs.25,000/-(Twenty five thousand) each with two sureties of the like amount each to the satisfaction of learned J.M.1st Class, Dhanbad in connection with Nirsa P.S. Case No. 152 of 2021 with the condition that they will co-operate with the investigation of the case and appear before the investigating officer as and when noticed by him and furnish their mobile number and photocopy of the Aadhar Card with an undertaking that they will not change their mobile number during the pendency of the case and subject to the conditions as laid down under Section 438(2) of the Code of Criminal Procedure.