High CourtsSingle Bench

Samridhi Bedi vs State Of Himachal Pradesh

High Court Of Himachal Pradesh · Decided on 31 July 2020 · Citation: (2020) 07 SHI CK 0012

HON’BLE JUDGES
Ajay Mohan Goel, J
ACTS & SECTIONS REFERRED
Code Of Criminal Procedure, 1973 — Section 439 · Narcotic Drugs And Psychotropic Substances Act, 1985 — Section 21,22,29, 61, 85
CASE NUMBER
Criminal Miscellaneous Petition (M) No. 1274 Of 2020
Ask AI about this case

AI Structured Summary

Not yet generated for this judgment

No AI summary yet

Generate an eight-section analysis of this judgment — facts, issues, reasoning, ratio and a plain-language gist.

Judgment

18 paragraphs · 304 words

Ajay Mohan Goel, J

1.

Notice. Mr. Dinesh Thakur, learned Additional Advocate General, accepts notice on behalf of the respondentÂ​State.

2.

By way of this petition filed under Section 439 of the Code of Criminal Procedure, the petitioner has prayed for grant of bail in FIR No. 81/2020,

dated 23.06.2020, registered under Sections 21,22,29, 61 and 85 of the Narcotic Drugs and Psychotropic Substances Act at Police Station Indora,

Police Post Damtal, H.P.

3.

Alongwith this bail petition, the petitioner has appended order dated 20.07.2020, passed by the Court of learned Special JudgeÂII, Kangra at

Dharamshala, H.P., which reads as under:

“...Reply/status report filed through eÂ​mail. Copy supplied. During course of arguments, ld. Counsel for the bail petitioner Sh. S.S. Rana, Advocate

vide his separate statement stated that he does not want to pursue the present application at this stage and he wants to withdraw the same. In view of

the statement of ld. Counsel for bail petitioner, the present bail application is dismissed as withdrawn. Ld. Counsel for the petitioner is directed to file

hard copy of the application, thereafter file after its due completion be consigned to the record room.â€​

4.

As earlier bail petition stood withdrawn by the petitioner which was filed in the Court of learned Special JudgeÂII, Kangra at Dharamshala, the

course open for the petitioner, in case she was advised to file a fresh petition, was to have had approached the same Court and not by way of

approaching this Court.

5.

At this stage, learned counsel for the petitioner submits that she may be permitted to withdraw this petition, with liberty to the petitioner to approach

the Court of learned Special JudgeÂ​II, Kangra at Dharamshala, H.P. by way of fresh petition, if so advised.

Petition is permitted to be withdrawn, with liberty as prayed for.

Copy dasti.