High CourtsSingle Bench(2020) 07 GUJ CK 0042

Samsher @ Kalubhai Khwajahussain Saiyed vs State Of Gujarat

Gujarat High Court · Decided on 21 July 2020

HON’BLE JUDGES
Dr A. P. Thaker, J
RESULT
Disposed Of
CASE NUMBER
Criminal Misc.Application (For Extension Of Temporary Bail) No. 3 Of 2020 In R/Criminal Misc.Application No. 8380 Of 2020

AI Structured Summary

Not yet generated for this judgment

Judgment

23 paragraphs · 416 words

Dr. A. P. Thaker, J

1.

Heard Mr.Shaikh, learned advocate for the applicant and Ms.Mehta, learned Additional Public Prosecutor for the respondent â€" State through

Video Conferencing.

2.

RULE. Ms.Mehta, learned Additional Public Prosecutor waives service of notice of rule on behalf of the respondent â€" State.

3.

Rule is fixed forthwith.

4.

By way of present application, the applicant â€" undertrial prisoner has prayed for extension of temporary bail which was granted by the Coordinate

Bench vide order dated 19.06.2020 passed in Criminal Misc. Application No.8380 of 2020 on the ground of financial assistance to the family and for

making arrangement of advocate fees and the same came to be extended by the Coordinate Bench vide order dated 02.07.2020 passed in Criminal

Misc. Application (for Extension of Temporary Bail) No.1 of 2020 in Criminal Misc. Application No.8380 of 2020.

5.

Learned advocate for the applicant â€" under-trial prisoner has submitted that initially, the under-trial prisoner has sought extension of temporary

bail which came to be extended by the Coordinate Bench for a period of two weeks and accordingly, the under-trial prisoner has to surrender on

17.07.2020. He has submitted that looking to the dilapidated condition of the house of the under-trial prisoner, his presence is required and, therefore,

the temporary bail granted to him may be extended to some extent.

6.

Learned Additional Public Prosecutor for the respondent â€" State has submitted that the under-trial prisoner has not surrendered before the Jail

Authority in time and, therefore, this application may be rejected.

7.

Having considered the submissions made on behalf of learned advocates for both the sides and the assurance given by the learned advocate for the

applicant - under-trial prisoner that the under-trial prisoner shall surrender on 24.07.2020 before the Jail Authority and he may be permitted to file

fresh application if needs arise, in future and at this stage, he seeks permission, under instructions, to withdraw the present application.

8.

In view of the above, the permission to withdraw the application is granted. The period during which the under- trial prisoner has not surrendered

before the Jail Authority i.e. 17.07.2020 to 24.07.2020 is treated to be extended of temporary bail which was granted earlier by two orders of this

Court. At the same time, the applicant is permitted to file a fresh application, if needs arise, in future.

9.

The present application stands disposed of as withdrawn. The under-trial prisoner shall surrender on 24.07.2020 before the Jail Authority without

fail. Rule is discharged.