AI Structured Summary
Not yet generated for this judgment
No AI summary yet
Generate an eight-section analysis of this judgment — facts, issues, reasoning, ratio and a plain-language gist.
Judgment
25 paragraphs · 510 wordsApplication for regular bail under Section 439 of Cr.P.C. The applicant is first accused in VC No.03/2021 of Vigilance and Anti-Corruption Bureau,
Thrissur for having allegedly committed offences punishable under Section 7A of the Prevention of Corruption (Amendment) Act, 2018 r/w Section
120B IPC.
The prosecution case, in brief, is that the applicant had demanded a sum of Rs.25,000/- to 30,000/- from the de facto complainant for allegedly
obtaining a building completion report from the 2nd accused, who was the Overseer of Choodal Grama Panchayat. Accordingly, on 16.02.2021 at
about 5 p.m. on information being passed by the de facto complainant to the Vigilance officer, a trap was made and the applicant who had come in his
car bearing registration No. KL 46 G 2871 parked it near Sankara Shopping Complex at Kecheri, in front of Janananma Hi-tech Laboratory. The de
facto complainant handed over a sum of Rs.25,000/- to the applicant and he was caught red handed by the officials and thereby committed the
offence. The applicant has been in judicial custody since his apprehension.
The applicant states that the allegations are not true. He is only a contractor and that he had induced the de facto complainant to deliver a sum of
Rs.25,000/- for the purpose of influencing the Overseer of the Grama Panchyat for issuance of the certificate is not true. The applicant has no
criminal antecedents. He has been in custody since his arrest and therefore seeks regular bail.
Heard the learned counsel appearing for the applicant and the learned Special Public Prosecutor appearing for the Vigilance Department.
It is submitted by the learned Special Public Prosecutor that the investigation is still at its infancy and therefore further documents have to be
collected for the purpose of evidence in connection with this crime. Therefore, the applicant may not be released on bail.
The applicant was apprehended on 16.02.2021 and has been in custody since then. His interrogation is already over. Further custodial interrogation
may not be required. There is no insistence on that by the learned Public Prosecutor. The applicant has admittedly no criminal antecedents also. The
documents pertaining to this crime is all available with the Panchayat and the 2nd accused and therefore further detention of the applicant may not be
required. Hence the application is allowed. The applicant is directed to be released on bail on execution of bond for Rs.1,00,000/-(Rupees one lakh
only) with two solvent sureties, each for the like amount to the satisfaction of the jurisdictional court and on following conditions:-
(i) He shall appear before the investigating officer on all Saturdays between 9 a.m. and 12 noon for a period of two months or till the filing of final
report whichever is earlier.
(ii) He shall not get involved in similar cases during the currency of the bail.
(iii) He shall not tamper with evidence, intimidate or influence the witnesses .
In case of violation of the bail conditions, the prosecution is at liberty to move for cancellation of the bail before the jurisdictional court.
